![](https://image.librarything.com/pics/fugue21/magnifier-left.png)
![](https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/P/198217126X.01._SX180_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)
Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... Shakespeare Was a Woman and Other Heresies: How Doubting the Bard Became the Biggest Taboo in LiteratureTekijä: Elizabeth Winkler
![]() - Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Palkinnot
"A delightful romp through the Shakespeare authorship question, exploring how doubting that William Shakespeare wrote the plays attributed to him became an act of blasphemy... and who the Bard might really be"-- Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-
![]() LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)822.33Literature English English drama Elizabethan 1558-1625 Shakespeare, William 1564–1616Kongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:![]()
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |
Anyway, I didn’t ever realize how absolutely little proof there is about the dude as the writer; Winkler does an amazing job breaking that down along with providing all the other potentials on the board. This isn’t about who else could be the author so much as the people out there who are so obsessed with it being only “the Stratford guy” and thinking anyone else who doesn’t believe it is literally deranged (making them the true villains here it seems). It’s honestly pretty astonishing how much silencing has occurred around anyone contemplating the authorship issue, and if English scholars actually had the funds I wouldn’t be surprised that they’d go in on black helicopters and drop the dissidents in holes somewhere without books.
This quote from Ros Barber (interviewed by the author Elizabeth Winkler) is perfect in breaking down how I feel about it all: ‘“I think the real Shakespeare story is, Shakespeare was an educated person. I don’t care which of the candidates it is. If they haven’t read a hell of a lot of books, they’re not Shakespeare.”’ (