Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... GUI Bloopers 2.0: Common User Interface Design Don'ts and Dos (2008)Tekijä: Jeff Johnson
- Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Kuuluu näihin sarjoihin
Is your application or Web site ready for prime time? A major revision of a classic reference, GUI Bloopers 2.0 looks at user interface design bloopers from commercial software, Web sites, Web applications, and information appliances, explaining how intelligent, well-intentioned professionals make these mistakes--and how you can avoid them. While equipping you with the minimum of theory, GUI expert Jeff Johnson presents the reality of interface design in an entertaining, anecdotal, and instructive way.* Updated to reflect the bloopers that are common today, incorporating many c Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-Suosituimmat kansikuvat
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)005.437Information Computer Science; Knowledge and Systems Computer programming, programs, data, security Systems programming and programs Systems programsKongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |
Of the 80+ points listed in this book, some are great Don's:
- Using checkboxes for non-ON/OFF setting
- Using dynamic menus where items change
- Using tabs as radio buttons
- Negative checkboxes
- Same title on different windows
- Asking user for random seeds
- Long ops don’t display progress
- Long ops provide no way to cancel
- Giving programmers the fastest computers
While some other donts are a bit too trvial, I think, such as these:
- Tiny fonts
- Too much text
- Bad writing.
- Cursor can’t keep up.
- “Cancel” doesn’t cancel
- Treating ui as low pri.
- Bad initial window location.
- Noisy search result
- Labels too far from data field.
But I suppose there is value in completeness.
Have not read the v1.0 of this book, so perhaps there were more interesting tidbits in the earlier edition. ( )