Pauline W. Chen
Teoksen Final Exam: A Surgeon's Reflections on Mortality tekijä
Tietoja tekijästä
Pauline W. Chen is a liver transplant and liver cancer surgeon, as well as a prolific author. Her work has been nominated for a National Magazine Award, and she has written for a number of publications, including The Virginia Quarterly Review, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Prevention näytä lisää Magazine. She also speaks regularly to medical and general audiences across the country. She is the author of Final Exam: A Surgeon's Reflections on Mortality, a New York Times bestseller that has been translated and sold in a dozen countries across the world. näytä vähemmän
Image credit: Joanne Chan
Tekijän teokset
Merkitty avainsanalla
Yleistieto
- Kanoninen nimi
- Chen, Pauline W.
- Muut nimet
- Chen, Pauline
- Syntymäaika
- 1964
- Sukupuoli
- female
- Kansalaisuus
- USA
- Koulutus
- Harvard University
Northwestern University - Ammatit
- doctor
professor
columnist - Organisaatiot
- The New York Times
University of California, Los Angeles
Jäseniä
Kirja-arvosteluja
Listat
Palkinnot
You May Also Like
Tilastot
- Teokset
- 3
- Jäseniä
- 521
- Suosituimmuussija
- #47,687
- Arvio (tähdet)
- 3.8
- Kirja-arvosteluja
- 17
- ISBN:t
- 9
- Kielet
- 2
- Kuinka monen suosikki
- 1
Despite the fact that I am well-versed in the palliative literature and had read many of the articles Dr. Chen cited her personal experiences lend a depth and character to the discussion that is priceless. Dr. Chen's strength is that she is brutally honest. She describes unflinchingly her avoidance of patients that were dying and her regret of being too terse at times. She discusses events that other medical non-fiction would gloss over.
My only grievances with the book is the end-notes. The book is rife with them (at one point there are three end notes corresponding to a single sentence) and they are not marked at all in the main text, although they are designed to refer to particular sentences in the main text. The end notes are written in a different style than the main narrative, and detract from the flow. By and large they fall into three categories: those that are essential to the text and directly related to the main text; those that are essential to the text, but not directly related to the main text and those that are not essential. The first two categories should have been integrated into the narrative and the third should have been eliminated.… (lisätietoja)