Kirjailijakuva
20 teosta 599 jäsentä 4 arvostelua 1 Favorited

Tietoja tekijästä

Edgar Andrews, BSc, PhD, DSc, FinstP. FIMMM, CEng, CPhys, is an expert on the science of large molecules and Emeritus Professor of Materials at the University of London. For several decades he was an international consultant to the Dow Chemical Co., and the 3M Co. both of USA. At the 1986 Huxley näytä lisää Memorial Debate he debated Richard Dawkins on creation vs. evolution. He has written extensively on science and religion and his book From Nothing to Nature has been translated into ten languages. näytä vähemmän

Tekijän teokset

Merkitty avainsanalla

Yleistieto

Sukupuoli
male

Jäseniä

Kirja-arvosteluja

Unbelievably stupid.
1 ääni
Merkitty asiattomaksi
lipidity | Mar 22, 2020 |
Summary: An exploration of the answers different worldviews come up with to the question of what it means to be human, making the case for a Christian view of humans descended from a historical Adam who was created in God's image, through whom sin entered the human race in the fall, and for the redemption of all who believe through the second Adam, Jesus Christ.

The question of who we are, and our place on Earth and in the cosmos, is perhaps one of the most important questions that we face. The author of this work, Edgar Andrews, an emeritus professor of Materials Science, looks at three of the possible answers on offer today--that we are evolved from the family of Apes, that we (or our predecessors) arrived here from an alien world, or that we were created by God, descended from a historic Adam.

The book consists of three parts. The first considers our place in the cosmos, and perhaps did we come from somewhere else? He considers the origins of the cosmos, and whether it is possible for the cosmos to be self-generating and he describes the search for extra-terrestrial life and the absence of any substantive finding, albeit many worlds have been identified that may be candidates for such life. He lays out a form of the "fine-tuned universe" argument advanced by Sir Martin Rees, and the counter explanations of multiverse theories. All of this suggests at very least that our existence in the cosmos may be a fairly singular event begging explanation.

The second part of the book explores man and the biosphere, that is, evolutionary explanations for our origins. He raises a number of questions about our descent from the apes in terms of the distinctiveness as opposed to the commonality of our respective genomes and he contends that paleontology has very little conclusive to tell us about our forebears. Finally, in one of the more fascinating chapters of the book, he discusses the challenging question of how human consciousness is to be explained. Using the analogy of a house, he discusses materialist, epiphenomenalist, and dualist explanations and contends that humans were created with material bodies and a nonmaterial, self-aware mind.

In part three, Andrews considers the biblical account of what it means to be human. Beginning with a discussion of worldview, and how we know what is real, he contends that the Biblical account warrants belief as being consistent with our understanding of ourselves and the cosmos, has made accurate predictions of future events, passes tests of historical accuracy, and leads people into transformative experiences of God through faith in Christ. The remainder of the book then unpacks this Biblical world view of a sovereign and immanent creator God, human sin, accountability, and the person and work of Christ. He argues for a historic Adamic couple from whom we are all descended, against other explanations of our progenitors, and what it means for us to be in the image of God distinguished as creatures of soul and spirit, language and logic, creativity and competence, and law and love. The book then concludes with two chapters on Christ as the second Adam and the evidences for Christ's resurrection, and the implications of this truth for our salvation and eternal destiny.

Andrews writes about fairly technical scientific material in clear, and sometimes witty, language, using readily understood analogies. I find it a bit puzzling that he at times uses scientific arguments (the Big Bang and Fine-Tuning) to advance his argument and then turns around and is utterly skeptical and questioning about anything to do with the evolution of human beings. I would have liked to see more engagement with scientists like Francis Collins, who not only see God's design in the human genome, but also do not see evolution as antithetical to the creative work of God, or even a historic Adam.

Rather than attacking evolution, I think it would have been more helpful to attack the underlying worldview of evolutionism, a worldview that assumes there is nothing more or other than the material world, and that only what may be confirmed empirically is real or true (of course this statement itself cannot be confirmed by such means!). Such assumptions not only preclude the activity of God in creating but also in sustaining the world. There are many who study evolution who see the hand of God at work, as they do in other "natural" processes. Andrews seems to suggest they have to choose between their science and their faith.

Nevertheless, this book addresses an important question, and eloquently describes the human dignity we enjoy as creatures in the image of God, and the wonder of Christ's redemptive work, and the joyful destiny of those who partake of his redemptive work and the power of the resurrection in salvation, Christ's living rule over his people, and the certainty of his return. Christian teachers and apologists will find this helpful--particularly, I think the discussions about fine-tuning, and about human consciousness as well as his delineation of what it means to say we exist in "the image of God."

____________________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review. The opinions I have expressed are my own.
… (lisätietoja)
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
BobonBooks | Sep 3, 2018 |
Edgar Andrews make a defense for God from a logical, scientific basis, he does not scientifically prove the existance of God, for he rightly points out that science does not posess the correct instruments to measure, probe or record Him, the physical being unable to observe the spiritual.
He does however provide an elegant answer to the many theories put forward to argue God out of existance.
Edgar is well qualified to refute the scientific argument, as he was involved in the human genome project, he specialises in long chain molecules, is a Professor of physics and a mature Christian.
No matter what your scientific education, there is a lot to be gained from this thoughtful and often humorous defense of the God of Creation.
… (lisätietoja)
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
Carl_Jones | 1 muu arvostelu | Jun 25, 2010 |
Nederlandse versie
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
ArneS_ | 1 muu arvostelu | Jan 4, 2015 |

You May Also Like

Tilastot

Teokset
20
Jäseniä
599
Suosituimmuussija
#41,952
Arvio (tähdet)
4.0
Kirja-arvosteluja
4
ISBN:t
27
Kielet
5
Kuinka monen suosikki
1

Taulukot ja kaaviot