Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational ThoughtTekijä: Keith E. Stanovich
- Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. Dear Psychology, I really wanna be friends. You ALWAYS have the answers and are so much smarter than me. But, well, with your "cognitive miser," "fluid intelligence" and "myopic loss aversion," you come off as kinda smug. And how many times are you going to say the same thing? Over and over and over again? Don't you know when to shut up? Or is just that you have nothing else to say? You're like my grandmother who goes on about her recipes. Don't get me wrong -- the food is great, but no matter how much she talks, I'll never be able to cook like that. In fact, I don't want to! I've got other stuff to do! Besides, her house doesn't even look like anyone lives in it and it smells funny. I still dig you and all, so I'm sure I'll come hangout again sometime. And maybe you're right, I am just (Moby) Dick-whipped, but let me work through it on my own, please? Fully Disjunctive Reason This, Esteban näyttää 3/3 ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
PalkinnotNotable Lists
Critics of intelligence tests-writers such as Robert Sternberg, Howard Gardner, and Daniel Goleman-have argued in recent years that these tests neglect important qualities such as emotion, empathy, and interpersonal skills. However, such critiques imply that though intelligence tests may miss certain key noncognitive areas, they encompass most of what is important in the cognitive domain. In this book, Keith E. Stanovich challenges this widely held assumption.Stanovich shows that IQ tests (or their proxies, such as the SAT) are radically incomplete as measures of cognitive functioning. They fail to assess traits that most people associate with "good thinking," skills such as judgment and decision making. Such cognitive skills are crucial to real-world behavior, affecting the way we plan, evaluate critical evidence, judge risks and probabilities, and make effective decisions. IQ tests fail to assess these skills of rational thought, even though they are measurable cognitive processes. Rational thought is just as important as intelligence, Stanovich argues, and it should be valued as highly as the abilities currently measured on intelligence tests. Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-Suosituimmat kansikuvat
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)153.9Philosophy and Psychology Psychology Cognition And Memory Assessment And IntelligenceKongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |
It happens here, too: the (interesting) stuff could have been comfily put in 50/70 pages, making it more readable.
Anyway, it seemed to me a good - although somewhat vague - introduction. ( )