Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... Plato: Euthyphro & Clitophon (Focus Classical Commentaries)Tekijä: Plato
- Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
This text is in Greek with extensive commentary in English and includes a general introduction, introductions to each of the two texts, appendices, glossary, and vocabulary. The Euthyphro and the Clitophon provide an ideal, exciting introduction to Plato and Greek prose. Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)184Philosophy and Psychology Ancient, medieval and eastern philosophy PlatonicKongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |
Bailly's manner of presentation of the other dialogue included in the volume, the Clitophon, is the same as that of the Euthyphro. It is highly unusual, and probably unprecedented, to find the Clitophon, a seldom-read dialogue whose authorship is disputed, included in a text for undergraduate students. This dialogue has the advantage, like the Euthyphro, of relatively manageable Greek; but so do several of the undisputed "Socratic" dialogues, any of which would be a far better choice for tyro students of Greek. The Clitophon, unlike the "Socratic" dialogues, has the disadvantage of its comparative obscurity and lack of importance within Plato's oeuvre.
If intended as a commentary for students of Greek reading Plato as their first author, this book suffers from a major ambiguity of purpose. As I noted above, it is intended, on the one hand, as an aid to a first reading of Plato's Greek (and, by extension, of Attic Greek generally). It mostly fails in this purpose on account of its cluttering of grammatical notes with somewhat difficult philosophical points. This intrusion of fairly advanced philosophical matter into the elementary grammatical notes can hardly fail to distract, and will perhaps overwhelm, neophyte students struggling merely to understand the language. This distraction is magnified by the commentary's extensive and numerous discussions devoted only or mainly to philosophical problems. For students of Greek reading Plato as a first author, the notes on the text should be dedicated almost exclusively to such basic grammatical help as is necessary to get through a first reading of a dialogue. (The Bryn Mawr Commentaries series, for example, admirably meets just this need.) However, there are two academic settings in which Bailly's approach may well be effective: either a course intended for relatively advanced philosophy students who are just beginning to learn Attic Greek, or a more advanced Greek course intended for Classics students who wish to learn ancient philosophy. In any event, however, I would recommend omitting the Clitophon. ( )