I read this about the time I switch over from King Arthur to Robin Hood... I liked the grey shades. ( )

Not a bad Robin Hood Novel, but has Robin Hood v. William the Conqueror. We see Saxon democrats v. Norman tyrants, but then Robin, for vengeance, not justice, joins against Waltheof another Saxon. Wrong time period for me. ( )

This is a quasi-historical fiction, a sort of 'what if' there was a real Robin Hood. The author choose to set this story at a more plausible time in history, at the time of William the Conqueror. The characters may be well known, but Godwin does an excellent job bringing them to life, and adding depth and detail to the famous stories of Robin Hood. I thought this was very good. ( )

Parke Godwin's Sherwood is a fairly well-written retelling of the Robin Hood legend set during the Norman conquest of Britain. Edward Aelredson is a thane whose father was killed at the battle of York. Edward (called Robin) must care for his people while maintaining his integrity amidst the uncertain relationships with the Norman invaders.

Godwin is a bit overdramatic at times, and sometimes I think he overdoes the whole "everyone-depends-on-everyone-else" theme. He has no scruples about describing sexual intimacy between the characters, though (mercifully) he manages to avoid being disgustingly explicit. I still find those parts unnecessary, however.

The characters are very well-drawn. Whoever thought that the Sheriff of Nottingham could be a sympathetic character? I don't mind the change, actually. Lady Maud is another exceptional character, though all are good.

Though I much prefer Robin McKinley's Outlaws of Sherwood for both the prose and characters, Sherwood is certainly enjoyable in its own right. The world feels realistic, complete with smells and the prejudices of the day. I am looking forward to reading the sequel, Robin and the King. Recommended. ( )