KotiRyhmätKeskusteluLisääAjan henki
Etsi sivustolta
Tämä sivusto käyttää evästeitä palvelujen toimittamiseen, toiminnan parantamiseen, analytiikkaan ja (jos et ole kirjautunut sisään) mainostamiseen. Käyttämällä LibraryThingiä ilmaiset, että olet lukenut ja ymmärtänyt käyttöehdot ja yksityisyydensuojakäytännöt. Sivujen ja palveluiden käytön tulee olla näiden ehtojen ja käytäntöjen mukaista.

Tulokset Google Booksista

Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.

Ladataan...

Vote for Caesar: How the Ancient Greeks and Romans Solved the Problems of Today

Tekijä: Peter Jones

JäseniäKirja-arvostelujaSuosituimmuussijaKeskimääräinen arvioKeskustelut
431581,229 (2.79)-
The expansion of the congestion charge zone, prices going up on the Underground, bendy buses--all are ideas brought about to try to make the traffic situation in London run more smoothly. Surely there must be a better way? In fact there is. In Roman times, when the streets were even more crowded, Caesar decreed that all vehicles (except those involved in building work) were banned from the city, while Nero took advantage of a major fire to broaden the streets to improve access. Whatever the problem, from the leader whose deputy wants to replace him to the question of how to make democracy really work, you can guarantee that our Classical forebears faced the same situation and came up with some far more effective solutions than current politicians. In this enthralling, informative, and hugely entertaining book, a leading Classicist highlights just how much there is to learn from the past and how things really were once so much better.… (lisätietoja)
-
Ladataan...

Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et.

Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta.

The first thing to realize about this book is that Peter Jones is discussing British life and politics, and in some detail, so the non-Brit probably won't always know what he is talking about, although the gist is generally clear enough. It really cannot be recommended as a survey of ancient life--but may interest some.

I give the book three stars not because it is uniformly mediocre, but because it varies so much in quality. Sometimes Jones' comparison are very apt, as when he contrasts the attitude of the ancients towards art with that of the modern day. I happened to agree with him, but more than that, it was a comparison of like to like. At these times, he can be quite witty:

"But at least Greeks were spared one ghastly feature of modern sport: athletes were not plastered all over with logos and advertisements. How could they be? They competed stark naked. Well, one hopes they could not have been, but no doubt a modern advertising guru would leap at the chance to advertise--well, one shudders to think what, let alone where."

In the other cases, the comparisons are poorly done. He compares the average Brit's notions of the good life and happiness to that of Seneca and Juvenal. Neither of the latter two were typical of their society, as they themselves were well aware. Moreover, this is cherry-picking, since they don't represent the whole of ancient philosophical thought,

This latter problem occurs too often. Jones times and again compares the realities, or at least of jaundiced view of the realities of modern life with an idealized, and sometimes downright sanitized view of the ancient world. He goes off on tedious rants about how how society is going to hell in a handbasket, just the sort of thing that I dreaded from my grandparents, and my parents, and now that I am getting older, my contemporaries. Society is always going to hell in a handbasket, and people have very selective memories. I often had to put the book down, and thought of giving it up altogether at these times.

He also argued, but didn't elucidate, that Rome had settled the problem of cultural conflict by allowing groups to follow their own customs, except for unexplained situations where Roman law took precedence. Isn't that pretty much allowed in the US, if not in the UK. My understanding is that the Amish settle civil matters, and some criminal matters, basically anything that require an individual to make a complaint, among themselves. They turn to the legal system only in the most serious cases. One point that Jones doesn't address is whether or not this is voluntary. Are people allowed to leave their subgroup? To take the Amish again, they can leave before baptism; if they leave after, they may be shunned, but I have never heard of the Amish using physical force to subdue the rebellious, unlike the honor killings of certain Muslim women who break away.

His defense of Athenian democracy is rather a crock. He argues that obviously, the slaves couldn't vote, since they would have voted to abolish slavery, so it doesn't count that they were excluded. And excluding women doesn't count because they were excluded in other systems. I would think that someone who read so much about philosophy would see the glaring logical error in that argument. If one is asking how good a democracy Athens was, it doesn't really matter what others were doing. Why not argue that modern Britain is a democracy because it is closer to one that medieval England?

In the end, I did finish the book, and it was interesting, but there are plenty of other books to give the reader a selective overview of the ancient world. ( )
2 ääni PuddinTame | Aug 19, 2010 |
ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Sinun täytyy kirjautua sisään voidaksesi muokata Yhteistä tietoa
Katso lisäohjeita Common Knowledge -sivuilta (englanniksi).
Teoksen kanoninen nimi
Alkuteoksen nimi
Teoksen muut nimet
Alkuperäinen julkaisuvuosi
Henkilöt/hahmot
Tärkeät paikat
Tärkeät tapahtumat
Kirjaan liittyvät elokuvat
Epigrafi (motto tai mietelause kirjan alussa)
Omistuskirjoitus
Ensimmäiset sanat
Sitaatit
Viimeiset sanat
Erotteluhuomautus
Julkaisutoimittajat
Kirjan kehujat
Alkuteoksen kieli
Kanoninen DDC/MDS
Kanoninen LCC

Viittaukset tähän teokseen muissa lähteissä.

Englanninkielinen Wikipedia

-

The expansion of the congestion charge zone, prices going up on the Underground, bendy buses--all are ideas brought about to try to make the traffic situation in London run more smoothly. Surely there must be a better way? In fact there is. In Roman times, when the streets were even more crowded, Caesar decreed that all vehicles (except those involved in building work) were banned from the city, while Nero took advantage of a major fire to broaden the streets to improve access. Whatever the problem, from the leader whose deputy wants to replace him to the question of how to make democracy really work, you can guarantee that our Classical forebears faced the same situation and came up with some far more effective solutions than current politicians. In this enthralling, informative, and hugely entertaining book, a leading Classicist highlights just how much there is to learn from the past and how things really were once so much better.

Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt.

Kirjan kuvailu
Yhteenveto haiku-muodossa

Current Discussions

-

Suosituimmat kansikuvat

Pikalinkit

Arvio (tähdet)

Keskiarvo: (2.79)
0.5
1
1.5
2 2
2.5 1
3 3
3.5
4 1
4.5
5

Oletko sinä tämä henkilö?

Tule LibraryThing-kirjailijaksi.

 

Lisätietoja | Ota yhteyttä | LibraryThing.com | Yksityisyyden suoja / Käyttöehdot | Apua/FAQ | Blogi | Kauppa | APIs | TinyCat | Perintökirjastot | Varhaiset kirja-arvostelijat | Yleistieto | 203,188,856 kirjaa! | Yläpalkki: Aina näkyvissä