KotiRyhmätKeskusteluLisääAjan henki
Etsi sivustolta
Tämä sivusto käyttää evästeitä palvelujen toimittamiseen, toiminnan parantamiseen, analytiikkaan ja (jos et ole kirjautunut sisään) mainostamiseen. Käyttämällä LibraryThingiä ilmaiset, että olet lukenut ja ymmärtänyt käyttöehdot ja yksityisyydensuojakäytännöt. Sivujen ja palveluiden käytön tulee olla näiden ehtojen ja käytäntöjen mukaista.

Tulokset Google Booksista

Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.

Ladataan...

Uncle Jack

Tekijä: Tony Williams

JäseniäKirja-arvostelujaSuosituimmuussijaKeskimääräinen arvioMaininnat
856314,699 (2.4)1
The person identified as the killer of five women in London East End in 1888 has never before been named a suspect in more than a hundred years of intense speculation. The co-author of the book is the great-great-nephew of the killer, who discovered extraordinary evidence while researching his illustrious ancestor. He did not set out to find Jack the Ripper, and did not want to believe that his great-great-uncle could have been responsible. But the evidence is incontrovertible. The killer was a very eminent man in his field, and naming him will cause huge shockwaves in the places where he is still venerated. No one has ever been able to find any evidence linking any of the suspects to the victims. This book puts forward clear evidence connecting the killer to three of the five victims, and circumstantial evidence connecting him to the other two. Patricia Cornwell's international bestseller PORTRAIT OF A KILLER may have established that artist Walter Sickert wrote incriminating letters, but all other authorities (including the police) have always believed that the letters were a hoax and were not written by the killer. the crimes were committed, and had the knowledge and skills which the nature of the murders required. For the first time, the book presents a consistent and plausible explanation for every aspect of the case, meeting all the key criteria of method, motive and opportunity. It also explains why the murders stopped as suddenly as they started. The authors have even discovered what they believe to be the murder weapon. Further forensic testing may be able to establish this beyond any reasonable doubt.… (lisätietoja)
-
Ladataan...

Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et.

Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta.

» Katso myös 1 maininta

Näyttää 1-5 (yhteensä 6) (seuraava | näytä kaikki)
The author and grt grt nephew of Dr. John Williams discovers 2 vague pieces of information and is convinced his Uncle was Jack the Ripper.He then sets out to prove his Uncle was NOT JTR.During the process,he then tries to prove his Uncle was in fact JTR.Mr. Williams tends to pull conclusions out of thin air in MANY instances.I had to re-read sections to see if I missed something.....I did not.He makes his own conclusions without valid documentation.He does find 2 items and 1 police report description that "MIGHT" put his Uncle on the suspect list,but he does not prove his Uncle was the Ripper.
I found the "medical experimentation" theory quite believable as an explanation for JTR (whomever he was).The author more than anything seems to just want to prove his Uncle was in fact JTR,but falls short.
The author also wants it known that his Uncle Jack was NOT a sadistic killer.He makes the claim that "JTR killed his victims BEFORE mutilating them".That statement is either ignorant or arrogant depending on what you derive from the book.To me JTR was a sadistic killer,PERIOD.
If in fact his Uncle was JTR then JTR built a museum memorial to himself in Wales,leaving possible clues behind and also having the last word.If his Uncle is not JTR ( I don't beleive he is) then the nephew is disgracing the reputaiton that his Uncle built.
I give this book 4 stars as it was an interesting read and does give some food for thought,but Mr. Williams evidence & research do NOT prove anything.It may put his Uncle as a "possible" suspect,but that is all.
I only hope the author is not in law enforcement,because he can make any innocent person guilty of a crime in a very few undocumented steps.
Mr. Williams almost seems to get gratifciation in what he feels is proof of his Uncle's crimes.
He appears to be as arrogant as he portrayed his Uncle. Mr. Williams is more magician that author.
( )
  LauGal | Aug 16, 2016 |
I'm something of an amateur Ripperologist and always pick up new books on the subject whenever I see them. This is less a book about Jack the Ripper and more a biography of John Williams. The author spends at least 3/4 of the book talking about and then reiterating Williams' life and then going over it all again. He harps on about a couple of pieces of evidence as if that's all that's needed to prove that Williams was the Ripper. The rest of the 'proof' is circumstantial, at best. When he can't find any the information he needs he makes a lot of suppositions that may or may not be true. I do realize that's a huge part of the whole Ripper thing and I don't 'really' have a problem with that. My complaint is more that this isn't a Ripper book. It's a biography of John Williams with a little bit of Ripper thrown in at the end. ( )
  TeaCat | Sep 2, 2010 |
I find this theory completely plausible. Well researched and fully explained even when the authors were unsure about facts I never really though they were reaching. In my mind this long standing mystery is finally solved. ( )
  trinibaby9 | Nov 24, 2009 |
This book is mildly entertaining but a thoroughly unconvincing case for the identity of Jack the Ripper. I am afraid that all the author has accomplished is a slander on the name of his famous ancestor. At best , the augument is that it might have been possible and even that is strained. There is no motive despite the author's best efforts. As for the famous doctor's early retirement, he was a passionate collector of books and anyone who gifts 30,000 books, in his case to the Welsh National Library has spent a lot of time reading and collecting. It is exactly the kind of interest that would convince a professional, who has earned more than sufficient money for his retirement, to leave the hurly burly of practice and indulge his passion. I don't think the author has any idea of the time and dedication required to amass such a good collection. This man collected and bequeathed many ancient Welsh writings and financially contributed to the building of a large library to house them. He was, for the most part a very good man, and the killings are totally inconsistent with other aspects of his life.
  bhowell | Feb 15, 2008 |
Extremely imaginative tale possibly implicating Sir John Williams, a physician specializing in female surgery at the time of the Ripper. Takes MANY liberties with strands of truth and perhaps people meeting in places also implicated with the Ripper. It takes great imagination on the part of the authors and suspension of intelligent thought on the part of the reader to make their theory that they have exposed Jack the Ripper the truth. ( )
  corgidog2 | Oct 20, 2007 |
Näyttää 1-5 (yhteensä 6) (seuraava | näytä kaikki)
ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Sinun täytyy kirjautua sisään voidaksesi muokata Yhteistä tietoa
Katso lisäohjeita Common Knowledge -sivuilta (englanniksi).
Teoksen kanoninen nimi
Alkuteoksen nimi
Teoksen muut nimet
Alkuperäinen julkaisuvuosi
Henkilöt/hahmot
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
Tärkeät paikat
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
Tärkeät tapahtumat
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
Kirjaan liittyvät elokuvat
Epigrafi (motto tai mietelause kirjan alussa)
Omistuskirjoitus
Ensimmäiset sanat
Sitaatit
Viimeiset sanat
Erotteluhuomautus
Julkaisutoimittajat
Kirjan kehujat
Alkuteoksen kieli
Kanoninen DDC/MDS
Kanoninen LCC

Viittaukset tähän teokseen muissa lähteissä.

Englanninkielinen Wikipedia (1)

The person identified as the killer of five women in London East End in 1888 has never before been named a suspect in more than a hundred years of intense speculation. The co-author of the book is the great-great-nephew of the killer, who discovered extraordinary evidence while researching his illustrious ancestor. He did not set out to find Jack the Ripper, and did not want to believe that his great-great-uncle could have been responsible. But the evidence is incontrovertible. The killer was a very eminent man in his field, and naming him will cause huge shockwaves in the places where he is still venerated. No one has ever been able to find any evidence linking any of the suspects to the victims. This book puts forward clear evidence connecting the killer to three of the five victims, and circumstantial evidence connecting him to the other two. Patricia Cornwell's international bestseller PORTRAIT OF A KILLER may have established that artist Walter Sickert wrote incriminating letters, but all other authorities (including the police) have always believed that the letters were a hoax and were not written by the killer. the crimes were committed, and had the knowledge and skills which the nature of the murders required. For the first time, the book presents a consistent and plausible explanation for every aspect of the case, meeting all the key criteria of method, motive and opportunity. It also explains why the murders stopped as suddenly as they started. The authors have even discovered what they believe to be the murder weapon. Further forensic testing may be able to establish this beyond any reasonable doubt.

Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt.

Kirjan kuvailu
Yhteenveto haiku-muodossa

Current Discussions

-

Suosituimmat kansikuvat

Pikalinkit

Arvio (tähdet)

Keskiarvo: (2.4)
0.5 2
1 1
1.5
2 2
2.5
3 3
3.5
4 1
4.5
5 1

Oletko sinä tämä henkilö?

Tule LibraryThing-kirjailijaksi.

 

Lisätietoja | Ota yhteyttä | LibraryThing.com | Yksityisyyden suoja / Käyttöehdot | Apua/FAQ | Blogi | Kauppa | APIs | TinyCat | Perintökirjastot | Varhaiset kirja-arvostelijat | Yleistieto | 203,187,263 kirjaa! | Yläpalkki: Aina näkyvissä