Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... The Company: A Short History of a Revolutionary Idea (2003)Tekijä: John Micklethwait, Adrian Wooldridge
- Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. Wooldridge, Adrian (Author) A nicely told history, but far too pro business to be seen a objective. Each criticism of corporations raised by the authors is slapped away in a condescending manner. The contention that the corporation is overwhelmingly a positive thing for the world seems supported, but while the authors dismiss faulty anti-corporation exaggerations they greatly downplay some points. They make it sound as if the genocide of the Belgian Congo was ended by a single protest, not a decades long struggle, and use hostage taking not murder or mutilation as the example of corporate brutality. Later when pointing out that corporations do more good than bad they go back to the Congo and point out one corporate official built schools and roads and failed a turn a profit in his corner of the Congo. This a really shocking downplaying of one of histories great tragedies. The history of the company. I liked the first, historical parts best. Share risks and rewards. European monarchs created chartered companies to pursue their dreams of imperial expansion." Ex east India Company, Virginia Company. Limited liability was key. "[T]he three big ideas behind the modern company: that it could be an "artificial person," with the same ability to do business as a real person; that it could issue tradable shares to any number of investors; and that those investors could have limited liability (so they could lose only the money they had committed to the firm)." 1. Violent history, now different. Slavery, war, etc. Merchants and monopolies. State monopolies inefficient. In Europe at least internal competition. Unlimited liability. De Medici innovative-separate partnerships and profit sharing arrangements. Northern Europe: copies much from Italy,but most imp contribution was guilds and chartered companies. Corporate bodies started, immortal. Towns, guilds, etc. 2. Royal charter-exclusive trading rights. Joint stock company. Start to buy shares, and limited liability. East India company troubled initially, but managed. Exclusive rights to sell tea in the American colonies-Boston tea party. Monopolies, criticism from Adam Smith. Courts. Government of big organizations and many people. 3. A prolonged and painful birth 1750-1862 Reinvigorate the idea of the company. Partnerships most common, but unlimited liability a problem. State competition to have the least regulation in order to attract companies. Railways changed things. Recommended for the historical parts. ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Kuuluu näihin kustantajien sarjoihin
Economist editors John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge reveal the company to be one of history's great catalysts, for good and for ill, a mighty engine for sucking in, recombining, and pumping out money, goods, people, and culture to every corner of the globe. What other earthly invention has the power to grow to any size, and to live to any age? What else could have given us both the stock market and the British Empire? The company man, the company town, and company time? Disneyfication and McDonald'sization, to say nothing of Coca-colonialism? Through its many mutations, the company has always incited controversy, and governments have always fought to rein it in. Today, though Marx may spin in his grave and anarchists riot in the streets, the company exercises an unparalleled influence on the globe, and understanding what this creature is and where it comes from has never been a more pressing matter. Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-Suosituimmat kansikuvat
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)338.7Social sciences Economics Production Business EnterprisesKongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |