Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... Atlas Shrugged (1957)Tekijä: Ayn Rand
» 41 lisää Favorite Long Books (106) 1950s (75) 20th Century Literature (482) Female Author (666) Female Protagonist (469) Books Read in 2020 (3,941) Banned Books Week 2014 (164) Política - Clásicos (88) Mad Men Reading List (16) Read These Too (150) Nifty Fifties (51) Shelf 101 (27) SHOULD Read Books! (189) Books on my Kindle (123) Awful Books (5) Very Very Bad (20) 2017 Goal (18) Best Dystopias (226) Great American Novels (127) Unread books (641) Favourite Books (1,764) Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. A fascinating world created by a self-hating author. I enjoyed what I read of it but quit halfway from overall annoyance at Rand's attitude. ( ) One can not really write a short review on this book if it ended with 5 stars. But one also can not write everything about this book without writing another book. I have pages and pages of handwritten text that I someday will put to use... ...but for now everything is simple: this book is about ideas as clock is about time. There is no other use for clock except idea of time and everything that comes with it. So is the book. Really that simple. It objectifies everyone and everything. To the point of been mechanical. And it's about mechanics too! About that steel-cage concrete philosophical building that rises to the sky in one single move. Everything is definitive. Steel-cage of story structure, apartments of world scenes, furniture of characters... it's as beautiful as one construction can be. Almost blinding... ...and there is love. The love... Love. There is no simple words describing love in this book. Except word "love". Very not for everyone love. It is mechanical and objectified of course. Also it is grand and steel strong. It is in the whole building, it is in the matter of the book. And the characters, they are cogs and springs, they are movers and counters, they are parts that make whole, they unique and exist as one. There is absolutely no character development whatsoever, there is no need in one. There is no place for doubts, there is only certainty. There is just this sound of steel beams smashing together, there is this sound of big industrial hammers smashing ideas into matter. There is this sound of beating heart of the machine. Imagine you sitting in Bugatti Veyron, imagine you pushing pedal and open throttle to release all that thousand wild horses into this world. There is a very clear line between people who going there with whole heart no mind technicalities, and the people who don't care because it's just a car. There is no one side to this book. There is good. There is bad. But personally I don't give a damn. I'm in love. A staggering portrait of emptiness. If only someone had remembered to tell the author. Atlas Shrugged is breathtaking empty. Devoid of morality, depleted of literary skill, deprived of sensible plot, deserted of dialogue. Philosophy textbooks disguised as novels are rarely appealing, but especially not when the underlying philosophy is so absurd. Like much throat-slitting libertarianism (which Rand chose to call "objectivism"), the views make minimal sense in regard to their actions, but make no sense whatsoever in regard to the consequences of those actions. Take a few logical steps down the line and see what kind of world you'll end up in if you follow these instructions. (If you're reading this on the cusp of the 2020s, you won't have to do too much guessing; Rand's principles underwrite some of our most prominent world politicians and thinkers.) Run. Take your children and your pets, grab that wad of cash from under grandma's mattress, and head for the hills. A world awaits you there of kindness and compassion, and - for that matter - genuine literature. Maybe you'll enjoy [a:Lawrence Durrell|8166|Lawrence Durrell|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1463722118p2/8166.jpg] or [a:Sally Rooney|15860970|Sally Rooney|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1534007127p2/15860970.jpg]? Perhaps you're a [a:Toni Morrison|3534|Toni Morrison|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1494211316p2/3534.jpg] type, a [a:Kazuo Ishiguro|4280|Kazuo Ishiguro|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1424906625p2/4280.jpg] acolyte, mad for [a:John Barth|8113|John Barth|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1222685060p2/8113.jpg] or eager for [a:George Eliot|173|George Eliot|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1596202587p2/173.jpg]. Whatever you choose, it's got to be better than this. As Robinson Jeffers famously said, "when the cities lie at the monster's feet, there are left the mountains". Rand succeeds despite shitty politics and a sophomoric world-view. The more I explore literature, the more I realize just how flawed a novel can be and still hold up. With Rand there are two types of characters and that's all you get: White Hats and Blacks Hats. The White Hats are the heroes, standing alone against an inferior sea of snivelling underlings, incapable of seeing just how magnificent the White Hats actually are. The Black Hats are any of the aforementioned underlings unfortunate enough to show up in the foreground sufficiently for Rand to take notice. Their job it to try to thwart the noble (and capitalistic) ambitions of the White Hats. On one level this is so much roman à clé, used to support Rand's philosophic darling, Objectivism. And in her mind, I have no doubt, the staring role of Chief White Hat belonged to Rand herself. The problem with literature as rhetoric is that humanity is invariably more complex and flawed than any such Black and White thinking can represent. In the real world, every White Hat riding in on White Horse probably has a whore tied up in the closet, just waiting for him (or her) to stop saving the world long enough to return and do whatever depravity White Hats do when no one is looking. Without nuance, character remains caricature. And yet the novel works. There are two overarching skills that come into play for novelists. Writing and storytelling. And while Rand is a bad writer she is a very good, if not great, storyteller. (This same argument could be made about J.K. Rowling, save that she doesn't have a political ax to grind - unless you include muggle discrimination in and amongst the wizard world. Also, literary theory doesn't always carry over well between mainstream/literary books and genre writing.) So while Rand's prose suffers from simplistic characterizations and a mind stuck somewhere in deep adolescence, the book itself is underpinned by an engaging story, a phenomenal sense of world and place, and a real talent for plotting that would be equally at home in, say, a book by Rushdie or Pynchon as one by Stephen King or Dan Brown. By all means, give it a try. Even with its deep flaws I gave it four stars. And I stand by that. Despite her considerable efforts to ruin it this novel has good bones. The only caveat would be for a young person approaching the book for the first time. Please understand that the politics presented here - those explicit and those implied - are untenable when held against the light. Neoconservatism (also confusedly referred to as Neoliberalism) is ultimately an attempt to justify our baser instincts as not merely acceptable and unavoidable, but noble. (For a more adult perspective, check out Ken Wilber, though his novel Boomeritis is lacking in all the places Rand excels. In short, he's not much in the novel-writing department. Luckily he writes mostly non-fiction. Start there.) If you can see past the sophism, you might just enjoy Atlas Shrugged. You'll also come to understand why Randall Jarrell referred to a novel as "a long piece of prose with something wrong with it."
"Despite laborious monologues, the reader will stay with this strange world, borne along by its story and eloquent flow of ideas." "to warn contemporary America against abandoning its factories, neglecting technological progress and abolishing the profit motive seems a little like admonishing water against running uphill." "inspired" and "monumental" but "(t)o the Christian, everyone is redeemable. But Ayn Rand’s ethical hardness may repel those who most need her message: that charity should be voluntary…. She should not have tried to rewrite the Sermon on the Mount." Atlas Shrugged represents a watershed in the history of world literature. Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article... "We struggle to be just. For we cannot help feeling at least a sympathetic pain before the sheer labor, discipline, and patient craftsmanship that went to making this mountain of words. But the words keep shouting us down. In the end that tone dominates. But it should be its own antidote, warning us that anything it shouts is best taken with the usual reservations with which we might sip a patent medicine. Some may like the flavor. In any case, the brew is probably without lasting ill effects. But it is not a cure for anything. Nor would we, ordinarily, place much confidence in the diagnosis of a doctor who supposes that the Hippocratic Oath is a kind of curse." "remarkably silly" and "can be called a novel only by devaluing the term" ... "From almost any page of Atlas Shrugged, a voice can be heard, from painful necessity, commanding: 'To the gas chambers — go!'" Sisältyy tähän:Sisältää nämä:Atlas Shrugged (Volume 1 of 2) (tekijä: Ayn Rand) Atlas Shrugged (Vol. 2 of 2) (tekijä: Ayn Rand) Lyhennelty täällä:Innoitti:Tällä on käyttöopas/käsikirja:Tämän tekstillä on selostus:Sisältää opiskelijan oppaanSisältää opettajan oppaanPalkinnotDistinctionsNotable Lists
Kun maailma jr̃kkyi on yksi maailmankirjallisuuden luetuimmista ja laajimmista romaaneista.Ayn Randin maailmankuulu dystopia sijoittuu epm̃r̃̃ĩseen tulevaisuuteen, jota leimaa pysh̃tyneisyyden ja nk̃a̲lattomuuden ilmapiiri. Koko amerikkalainen unelma uhkaa vaipua piittaamattomuuden suohon. Tt̃ ̃lohdutonta todellisuutta vastaan nousee taistelemaan Taggart Transcontinental -rautieyhtin̲ perijt̃r̃ Dagny Taggart, joka haluaa pelastaa perheyrityksens ̃ja samalla perinteisen amerikkalaisen itsekunnioituksen. Tehtṽ ̃ei ole helppo, sill ̃edes omasta perhe- ja ystṽp̃iirist ̃ei tunnu ly̲tyvñ ketñ̃, joka olisi sĩlyttñyt lapsuuden ja nuoruuden ihanteensa. Onnekseen hñ saa rinnalleen ters̃tehtailija Henry Reardenin, joka on Dagnyn tavoin valmis uhmaamaan vallitsevaa yhteiskunnallista ilmapiiri ̃ja siihen perustuvia rakenteita. Alkaa uskomaton yhteinen matka, joka luotaa syvl̃t ̃amerikkalaisia ja yleisinhimillisi ̃arvoja.?Kun amerikkalaisilta vuonna 1991 kysyttiin, mik ̃kirja on eniten vaikuttanut heidñ elm̃ñ̃s,̃ Atlas Shrugged nousi toiselle sijalle heti Raamatun jl̃keen. ?Kirja on kñ̃netty 29 kielelle, ja sit ̃on myyty yli yhdeksñ miljoonaa kappaletta. ?Tm̃ ̃tasan 60 vuotta sitten julkaistu Ayn Randin pt̃̃eos on osoittautunut jatkuvasti ajankohtaisuutensa, ja sit ̃myydñ̃ edelleen noin neljñnesmiljoonaa kappaletta vuosittain. [Elib] Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-Suosituimmat kansikuvat
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)813.52Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1900-1944Kongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Penguin AustraliaPenguin Australia on kustantanut tämän kirjan 2 painosta. Painokset: 0451191145, 0141188936 HighBridgeHighBridge on julkaissut painoksen tästä kirjasta. HighBridge AudioHighBridge Audio on julkaissut painoksen tästä kirjasta. |