KotiRyhmätKeskusteluLisääAjan henki
Etsi sivustolta
Tämä sivusto käyttää evästeitä palvelujen toimittamiseen, toiminnan parantamiseen, analytiikkaan ja (jos et ole kirjautunut sisään) mainostamiseen. Käyttämällä LibraryThingiä ilmaiset, että olet lukenut ja ymmärtänyt käyttöehdot ja yksityisyydensuojakäytännöt. Sivujen ja palveluiden käytön tulee olla näiden ehtojen ja käytäntöjen mukaista.

Tulokset Google Booksista

Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.

Ladataan...

The Lives of the Artists: A Selection, Volume 1 (1965)

Tekijä: Giorgio Vasari, Giorgio Vasari

Muut tekijät: George Bull (Kääntäjä)

Muut tekijät: Katso muut tekijät -osio.

Sarjat: The Lives of the Artists: A Selection (1)

JäseniäKirja-arvostelujaSuosituimmuussijaKeskimääräinen arvioMaininnat
483250,578 (4.02)11
Beginning with Cimabue and Giotto in the thirteenth century, Vasari traces the development of Italian art across three centuries to the golden epoch of Leonardo and Michelangelo. Great men, and their immortal works, are brought vividly to life, as Vasari depicts the young Giotto scratching his first drawings on stone; Donatello gazing at Brunelleschi's crucifix; and Michelangelo's painstaking work on the Sistine Chapel, harassed by the impatient Pope Julius II. The Lives also convey much about Vasari himself and his outstanding abilities as a critic inspired by his passion for art.… (lisätietoja)
-
Ladataan...

Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et.

Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta.

» Katso myös 11 mainintaa

näyttää 2/2
"But what inflicted incomparably greater damage and loss on the arts than the things we have mentioned [Constantine’s move to Byzantium, invasions, etc.] was the fervent enthusiasm of the new Christian religion. After long and bloody combat, Christianity, aided by a host of miracles and the burning sincerity of its adherents, defeated and wiped out the old faith of the pagans. Then with great fervour and diligence it strove to cast out and utterly destroy every last possible occasion of sin; and in doing so it ruined or demolished all the marvellous statues, besides the other sculptures, the pictures, mosaics and ornaments representing the false pagan gods; and as well as this it destroyed countless memorials and inscriptions left in honour of illustrious persons who had been commemorated by the genius of the ancient world in statues and other public adornments. Moreover, in order to construct churches for their own services the Christians destroyed the sacred temples of the pagan idols. To embellish and and heighten the original magnificence of St Peter’s they despoiled of its stone columns the mausoleum of Hadrian (today called Castel Sant’Angelo) and they treated in the same way many buildings whose ruins still exist. These things were done by the Christians not out of hatred for the arts but in order to humiliate and overthrow the pagan gods. Nevertheless, their tremendous zeal was responsible for inflicting severe damage on the practice of the arts, which then fell into total confusion."
- From Vasari’s Preface (pp. 36-7)

Vasari may have taken his cue from Petrarch, who wrote in his poem Africa, written in 1338, a year after he first visited Rome, addressing the poem itself: "for you, if you should long outlive me, as my soul hopes and wishes, there is perhaps a better age in store; this slumber of forgetfulness will not last forever. After the darkness has been dispelled, our grandsons will be able to walk back into the pure radiance of the past."

A century after Petrarch, Leon Battista Alberti, the pioneer of Renaissance art theory, wrote in On Painting (De pictura) along similar lines as Vasari would do another century later: "I used to marvel and at the same time to grieve that so many excellent and superior arts and sciences from our most vigorous antique past could now seem lacking and almost wholly lost. We know from [remaining] works and through references to them that they were once widespread. Painters, sculptors, architects, musicians, geometricians, rhetoricians, seers and similar noble and amazing intellects are very rarely found today and there are few to praise them. (...) It must be admitted that it was less difficult for the Ancients--because they had models to imitate and from which they could learn--to come to a knowledge of those supreme arts which today are most difficult for us. Our fame ought to be much greater, then, if we discover unheard-of and never-before-seen arts and sciences without teachers or without any model whatsoever. Who could ever be hard or envious enough to fail to praise Pippo the architect on seeing here such a large structure, rising above the skies, ample to cover with its shadow all the Tuscan people, and constructed without the aid of centering or great quantity of wood? (...) if I judge rightly, it was probably unknown and unthought of among the Ancients. But there will be other places, Filippo, to tell of your fame, of the virtues of our Donato [Donatello], and of the others who are most pleasing to me by their deeds." - Alberti, On Painting, Prologue addressed to Filippo Brunelleschi (1435)

Vasari thought of the achievements in art and architecture of the ancient Greeks and Romans as a Golden Age, and that of the Medieval period which followed as a period of decline. (He hated Gothic art and architecture – that’s also why he chose the term "Gothic" – it was about the worst term he could think of, and he used it as a synonym for "barbaric"...) With the gradual rediscovery of the ancient works of art ("those which were produced in Corinth, Athens, Rome, and other famous cities, before the time of Constantine"), he sees a new beginning: "helped by some subtle influence in the very air of Italy, the new generations started to purge their minds of the grossness of the past so successfully that in 1250 the heaven took pity on the talented men who were being born in Tuscany [Cimabue et al.] and led them back to the pristine forms. Before then, during the years after Rome was sacked and devastadted and swept by fire, men had been able to see the remains of arches and colossi, statues, pillars and carved columns; but until the period we are discussing they had no idea how to use or profit from this fine work." (p. 45)

The Lives consists of three parts. Vasari writes in his Preface to Part Two: "I have divided the artists into three sections or, shall we say, periods, each with its own recognizably distinct character, running from the time of the rebirth of the arts up to our own times." The first part includes Cimabue and Giotto – artists that "mark a new beginning, opening the way for the better work which followed. (...) Then in the second period there was clearly a considerable improvement in invention and execution, with more design, better style, and a more careful finish." (Ghiberti, Brunelleschi, Donatello, Fra Angelico, Alberti, Filippo Lippi, Botticelli, etc.) - This is followed by the third period when "art has achieved everything possible in the imitation of nature and has progressed so far that is thas more reason to fear slipping back than to expect ever to make further advances." (pp. 84-5) The third part includes all the giants of Renaissance art. Leonardo, Giorgione, Correggio, Raphael, Michelangelo and Titian have been selected for this edition.

The Life of Michelangelo is the longest by far, and Vasari was proud of being able to call himself his friend. Michelangelo wasn’t all that happy about everything Vasari wrote. Possibly he considered Vasari most of all a useful contact between himself and Duke Cosimo de' Medici in Florence while he was working in Rome – and later he asked his friend Ascanio Condivi to write about his life and to correct some of the things Vasari had got wrong. I haven’t read Condivi’s Vita yet, but I enjoyed Vasari’s account in spite of Michelangelo’s objections to it. In fact I found even his gushing over Michelangelo both amusing and understandable, and by then I had gotten used to Vasari’s style and knew his strengths and weaknesses, so I had no problem bearing with him. – Anyway, Vasari later revised his account of Michelangelo based on that of Condivi, and he provides a wealth of information. The revised and enlarged edition of the Lives was published in 1568, and it is selections from this later edition that has been translated here.

George Bull writes in his Introduction: “The letters of introduction to Cosimo for the 1550 and 1568 editions of the Lives echo in the obsequiousness other letters addressed by artists and writers to the Medici – notably Machiavelli’s letter to Cosimo’s father, Lorenzo, at the head of The Prince: the humble posture adopted in these dedications reflected perhaps, standard modes of address as much as genuine servility. More interesting is the manner in which both Machiavelli and Vasari interpreted political and art history, respectively, in terms of inevitable progression and decline and yet, paradoxically, suggested that the decline could be arrested by genius, by the virtù of a political leader or artist, endowed by nature with great ability and taught to emulate the perfection reached in the past. This affirmation of virtù has been called the ‘fundamental theme of the Lives’.” (p. 15)

“In their entirety, the Lives may fairly be called a work of art. On one great canvas Vasari painted a harmonious and glowing composition which sustains with ease the task of conveying the revolutionary nature of of what happened in Italian art between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries. He lifted the story of Tuscan art (...) to the plane of the heroic, stretching back to the quasi-legendary figures of Cimabue and Giotto, and forward to the inspired Michelangelo...” (p. 16)

As Bull also writes, it can get a bit boring at times, but you keep reading because when he really likes a piece of art, Vasari’s enthusiasm often gives his style a lift and makes him write with flair. And there are endless examples of that in this book. He’s also emphatically Florence-centric, which gets kind of entertaining, especially as the book progresses. And Vasari provides plenty of amusing anecdotes and gossip, so that this in a way makes up for the occasional parts where the writing just drags along. - There’s e.g. the story of Giotto’s O, and of how Brunelleschi, to illustrate how his dome could be self-supporting, made an egg stand upright on a slab of marble by hitting one end of the egg hard against it, and later how he feigned illness to expose the fact that Lorenzo Ghiberti (who received the same pay) was not competent to take over the work on the dome in his absence. Stories and anecdotes you may have read before, but this is where they are first told.
There’s also this great anecdote about Michelangelo:
"When he saw the David in place [at the entrance to the Palazzo della Signoria] Piero Soderini was delighted; but while Michelangelo was retouching it he remarked that he though the nose was too thick. Michelangelo noticing that Gonfalonier was standing beneath the Giant and that from where he was he could not see the figure properly, to satisfy him climbed on the scaffolding by the shoulders, seized hold of a chisel in his left hand, together with some of the marble dust lying on the planks, and as he tapped lightly with the chisel let the dust fall little by little, without altering anything. Then he looked down at the Gonfalonier, who had stopped to watch, and said:
'Now look at it.'
'Ah, that’s much better,' replied Soderini. 'Now you’ve really brought it to life.'
And then Michelangelo climbed down, feeling sorry for those critics who talk nonsense in the hope of appearing well informed.”
(p. 338-9)

The Renaissance gave birth to great art (among other things), and also to the first art-history. Vasari was even the first to use the term Renaissance (rinascita) in print. One of his preoccupations was disegno: drawing and making preparatory sketches was something he saw as being of prime importance for a painter. I can agree with this to a large degree, but this and other preoccupations could make him unjust towards some painters. He also at times makes mistakes when describing paintings, getting them mixed up, etc. - possibly because he hadn’t actually seen them, but had to rely on hearsay. These are facts that doesnt really diminish his accomplishment with the Lives, because for a large part his aesthetic judgement was acute and to the point. Nevertheless it is a pity that because he was seen as an authority for such a long period of time, many of these mistakes were perpetuated, a few even into our own times. But however that may be, by delving into Vasari's Lives you’re bound to add something new to your knowledge about most of the great artists he has written about – and not the least do you get to know the art world of the early 16th century quite intimately as seen through the eyes of Vasari. For me this was not a book to simply read straight through - I've been taking my time and mostly enjoying bite-size chunks of it and letting the book rest for a while in between readings. These are all the major artists and architects of the period between the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries after all In this edition, George Bull has made his selection from the top shelf. Now I'll have to get hold of the second volume of his excellent translation of the Lives as well..




This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. ( )
  saltr | Feb 15, 2023 |
Giorgio Vasari (1511-1574) was an artist, architect, and friend to Michelangelo, so his ‘sketches’ of the lives of Italian artists from the 13th to the 16th centuries is of special interest - it’s art history by a guy who was essentially ‘right there’.

The editors of this version wisely pared down the number of artists that Vasari actually wrote about, which he broke into three parts. The first covers Cimabue and Giotto, the two who began breaking from Byzantine forms to usher in the Renaissance, the second includes Ghiberti, Masaccio, Brunelleschi, Donatello, and Botticelli among others from the 14th and 15th centuries, and the third includes Leonardo da Vinci, Raphael, and Michelangelo. My mind boggles at that last magnificent threesome, and how they were all together in the same place at the same time, even if they didn’t get along together all that well.

Vasari gets his dates mixed up at times, and sometimes misattributes artwork, but he has a great eye as an art critic, and certainly gets the spirit of these men right. Here is how he opens the chapter on Leonardo: “In the normal course of events many men and women are born with various remarkable qualities and talents; but occasionally, in a way that transcends nature, a single person is marvelously endowed by heaven with beauty, grace, and talent in such abundance that he leaves other men far behind, all his actions seem inspired…”

I confess it’s a little tough to read through some sections of this book, as Vasari has a tendency to abbreviate the actual lives of these artists and describes their work one piece after another in detail, so I skimmed at times. Much better in a modern edition would be an illustrated book with color insets interleaved. As it was, I spent a lot of time looking up art online, which was fun in its own right, but hit or miss in terms of finding specific work. I would also recommend skipping his prefaces to the three parts altogether.

However, with that said, the personal stories and anecdotes recorded by Vasari are priceless, and 5-star nuggets of gold. Here’s a sample:

- Giotto drawing a perfect red circle without moving his arm when a courtier of Pope Benedict IX was sent for a sample of his work.

- Donatello getting angry at Brunelleschi for his criticism of a crucifix, saying ‘Get some wood and do it yourself’, and then marveling at what Brunelleschi later produced. Donatello’s generosity with workmen and friends while he was alive, and then leaving his small farm to a peasant instead of greedy relatives because he deserved it more.

- Brunelleschi’s initial proposals for the dome of the Duomo in Florence being met with ridicule, and after heated exchanges, being carried out as onlookers thought he was deranged. Later, after his plan was accepted, his anger at Ghiberti being named co-architect, and doing everything he could to get him removed.

- Fra Filippo Lippi being seized at sea by Moorish galleys and taken captive to Barbary in chains, where he would spend a year and a half before impressing his master with his artistic ability so much that he was freed. This same Fra Filippo being so lustful after women that Cosimo de’ Medici locked him up, only to have him escape to satisfy his desires.

- On seeing birds for sale, Da Vinci paying the price asked, and then setting them free. Da Vinci’s inventions, drawings, and dissections that he documented with characters written in reverse with the left hand.

- Da Vinci spending long hours contemplating next steps in his painting, having a prior getting impatient and pressing him to hurry up and finish, and Da Vinci telling a duke that he could make the prior the model for Judas if necessary, much to the duke’s delight. Similarly, Michelangelo’s struggles with Popes who were impatient at times, insulting at others, once causing him to storm off, pack up and leave town.

- Da Vinci painting Mona Lisa, the wife of Francesco del Giocondo, and while doing so, “employing singers and musicians or jesters to keep her face full of merriment and so chase away the melancholy that painters usually give to portraits.” Think of that next time you contemplate her smile.

- The animosity and rivalry between Leonardo and Michelangelo, as well as Raphael sneaking in to see Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel before it was done, and adapting his own art as a result.

- Giorgione becoming afflicted with the plague from his lover, and dying at 33. Similarly, Raphael’s lifelong love of mistress Margarita Luti, who he painted a couple of times, as well as his “great fondness for women” and practice of “always indulging his sexual appetites”; upon returning from one such session of excess with a violent fever, being bled to no avail, and dying tragically at 37.

- Michelangelo being beaten by his father and older brothers as a youth because he was so obsessed with drawing. A rival artist, Torrigiano, later breaking his nose out of jealousy so badly it marked Michelangelo for life.

- Michelangelo getting the block of marble that he would sculpt his David out of from basically a discard pile, the block having been previously used unsuccessfully by another artist, Simone da Fiesole.

This may be a good book to bring along while touring Florence or Rome. It may not be perfect as history or always captivating in its story-telling, but it is pretty unique to invite someone from 450 years ago into your study, and to have him tell you stories about artists you revere. ( )
1 ääni gbill | Mar 8, 2015 |
näyttää 2/2
ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu

» Lisää muita tekijöitä

Tekijän nimiRooliTekijän tyyppiKoskeeko teosta?Tila
Giorgio Vasariensisijainen tekijäkaikki painoksetlaskettu
Vasari, Giorgiopäätekijäkaikki painoksetvahvistettu
Bull, GeorgeKääntäjämuu tekijäkaikki painoksetvahvistettu
GiottoKansikuvataiteilijamuu tekijäeräät painoksetvahvistettu

Kuuluu näihin sarjoihin

Kuuluu näihin kustantajien sarjoihin

Sinun täytyy kirjautua sisään voidaksesi muokata Yhteistä tietoa
Katso lisäohjeita Common Knowledge -sivuilta (englanniksi).
Teoksen kanoninen nimi
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
Alkuteoksen nimi
Teoksen muut nimet
Alkuperäinen julkaisuvuosi
Henkilöt/hahmot
Tärkeät paikat
Tärkeät tapahtumat
Kirjaan liittyvät elokuvat
Epigrafi (motto tai mietelause kirjan alussa)
Omistuskirjoitus
Ensimmäiset sanat
Sitaatit
Viimeiset sanat
Erotteluhuomautus
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
This is volume one of an abridged set. Please do not combine with other abridgments unless you are sure they contain the same selections.
Julkaisutoimittajat
Kirjan kehujat
Alkuteoksen kieli
Kanoninen DDC/MDS
Kanoninen LCC

Viittaukset tähän teokseen muissa lähteissä.

Englanninkielinen Wikipedia (1)

Beginning with Cimabue and Giotto in the thirteenth century, Vasari traces the development of Italian art across three centuries to the golden epoch of Leonardo and Michelangelo. Great men, and their immortal works, are brought vividly to life, as Vasari depicts the young Giotto scratching his first drawings on stone; Donatello gazing at Brunelleschi's crucifix; and Michelangelo's painstaking work on the Sistine Chapel, harassed by the impatient Pope Julius II. The Lives also convey much about Vasari himself and his outstanding abilities as a critic inspired by his passion for art.

Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt.

Kirjan kuvailu
Yhteenveto haiku-muodossa

Current Discussions

-

Suosituimmat kansikuvat

Pikalinkit

Arvio (tähdet)

Keskiarvo: (4.02)
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3 5
3.5 3
4 6
4.5
5 7

Oletko sinä tämä henkilö?

Tule LibraryThing-kirjailijaksi.

Penguin Australia

Penguin Australia on julkaissut painoksen tästä kirjasta.

» Kustantajan sivusto

 

Lisätietoja | Ota yhteyttä | LibraryThing.com | Yksityisyyden suoja / Käyttöehdot | Apua/FAQ | Blogi | Kauppa | APIs | TinyCat | Perintökirjastot | Varhaiset kirja-arvostelijat | Yleistieto | 203,204,069 kirjaa! | Yläpalkki: Aina näkyvissä