Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... The rooster (surviving with style series #1)Tekijä: Richard Peters
- Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. This review was written for LibraryThing Member Giveaways. This was a story I received from Library Thing's early reviewers. It is a short story about a survivors in post apocalyptic south Texas. The main character John Randell is kidnapped by 5 commandos while out on a foraging party. He comes to find out that camp yea has been sent to is ran by all women. I love the idea that this camp is run by women has all of the amenities, while the men's camps are living like cave people. The women essentially rape men to get pregnant, they really have no other need for them. However, the upper command has no idea that a rebellion is brewing. This was a surprisingly good novel, there was an actual story line and not just sex scenes. It was interesting to have the women be the aggressors, as in most romance novels, rape isn't really rape which I think is horrendously misleading, but I don't have a soap box about it either. I was surprised that when I got to the end I felt it was too short of a story and I wanted to read more and find out what happens with the rebellion. Peters has good writing, very easy flow.For a full review see my blog http://www.adventuresofabibliophile.blogspot.com This review was written for LibraryThing Member Giveaways. Easy reader that is action packed. Who doesn't love a good post apocryphal story with zombies. I thought it was well written. Cannot wait for the next book. This review was written for LibraryThing Member Giveaways. “The Rooster” Surviving with Style Series Book 1By: Richard Peters Smashwords First Edition55 pages 2014 Reviewed by: tk Copy Courtesy of Early Reader Librarything Synopsis: John Randalls’ friend is dead, he has to leave…now! Surviving a post apocalyptic zombie outbreak is his current mission objective. Against all odds a female recovery team rescues John only to become a prisoner within a compound of an all women population. Is he in heaven or hell? Thoughts: This short story is action packed, with a bonus of spice. I think any man would like to be in John Randall’s’ shoes for a short while. I enjoyed the story, but thought it could have been extended a bit. I wanted more about Johns’ love interest. What about Rachelle? Where will they go? The right amount of tease to peak your interest and look forward to the next book in the series. Sex, zombies, and romance, variety is the spice of life. Enjoy! näyttää 4/4 ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |
Author Richard Peters, to his credit, includes scenes of Our Hero realizing that being the lone man in an all-female community may not be the horny-guy-fantasy-come-true that it seems to be. At the end of the day, though, this is not a story about gender-role reversal or a Heinlein-esque satire of present-day sexual hang-ups. The plot acts like the batter in a high-quality fruitcake: Its function is to glue together the bits that you bought the product for in the first place.
The scenes of mayhem and carnage in The Rooster play as briskly and efficiently as the on-screen combat in a “first-person-shooter” video game. Unfortunately, the sex scenes play the same way. The Rooster comes on like the creative offspring of ménage-a-trois between a pulp science-fiction novel, a “women-in-prison” exploitation film, and a copy of Penthouse Letters magazine, but it doesn’t have the courage of its raunchy convictions. Peters fills the pages with bondage, sadism, voyeurism, domination, sexual slavery, and (implied) lesbianism—not to mention straightforward heterosexual lust—but his clinically detached voice leeches out all trace of titillation (let alone eroticism). “Your mileage may vary,” however, and in the case of this low-priced novella it will cost you very little—in time or money—to find out whether yours, in fact, does. ( )