Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.
Ladataan... In Defence of the Terror: Liberty or Death in the French Revolution (2003)Tekijä: Sophie Wahnich
- Ladataan...
Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta. näyttää 2/2 ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Kuuluu näihin kustantajien sarjoihin
For two hundred years after the French Revolution, the Republican tradition celebrated the execution of princes and aristocrats, defending the Terror that the Revolution inflicted upon on its enemies. But recent decades have brought a marked change in sensibility. The Revolution is no longer judged in terms of historical necessity but rather by "timeless" standards of morality. In this succinct essay, Sophie Wahnich explains how, contrary to prevailing interpretations, the institution of Terror sought to put a brake on legitimate popular violence--in Danton's words, to "be terrible so as to spare the people the need to be so"--and was subsequently subsumed in a logic of war. The Terror was "a process welded to a regime of popular sovereignty, the only alternatives being to defeat tyranny or die for liberty." Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt. |
Current Discussions-Suosituimmat kansikuvat
Google Books — Ladataan... LajityypitMelvil Decimal System (DDC)944.044History and Geography Europe France and region France Revolution 1789-1804 Reign of terror, May 1793-July 1794Kongressin kirjaston luokitusArvio (tähdet)Keskiarvo:
Oletko sinä tämä henkilö? |
Some passages are frustrating and I had to read over and over to understand - the English isn't always idiomatic and some phrases are rendered in a weird way. A few of the quotes from other philosophers are impossible to understand so I gave up - I've read them over and over and over and not had a clue what they're saying. It's especially frustrating because the terms used aren't hard, they're just put together in baffling ways. It uses a few French terms consistently but never provides a definition. The book benefits from some knowledge of the figures and events of the French Revolution which isn't provided - I know the basics but not what every figure mentioned did. I realised after a bit I was clearly not the original audience for the book, but it's not that I'm missing major background, just useful facts. It'd have been better if Verso had focused on stuff like this, instead of the pretty ridiculous introduction from Zizek (300 is a good movie and not a racist caricature if you make some highly unlikely assumptions. Whatever dude, you're talking bollocks). In general, the book was tough to read. Some parts were ok but you could end up on a nearly unintelligible paragraph pretty often. I feel like I completely missed out on what several key concepts mean. Overall, it's an interesting work seriously marred by the pretty poor work by the folks at Verso. A great shame.
As an aside, One of the things which stands out the most here is the absurd and hideous attacks on the French Revolution from mainstream figures. Hannah Arendt's claims about things "founded on pity" as attacks on any attempt at equality - she makes Hayek style claims about mediocrity and how horrible equality is - are almost unbelievable in their contempt for the working class.
( )