KotiRyhmätKeskusteluLisääAjan henki
Etsi sivustolta
Tämä sivusto käyttää evästeitä palvelujen toimittamiseen, toiminnan parantamiseen, analytiikkaan ja (jos et ole kirjautunut sisään) mainostamiseen. Käyttämällä LibraryThingiä ilmaiset, että olet lukenut ja ymmärtänyt käyttöehdot ja yksityisyydensuojakäytännöt. Sivujen ja palveluiden käytön tulee olla näiden ehtojen ja käytäntöjen mukaista.

Tulokset Google Booksista

Pikkukuvaa napsauttamalla pääset Google Booksiin.

Assholes: A Theory Tekijä: Aaron James
Ladataan...

Assholes: A Theory (alkuperäinen julkaisuvuosi 2012; vuoden 2014 painos)

Tekijä: Aaron James (Tekijä)

JäseniäKirja-arvostelujaSuosituimmuussijaKeskimääräinen arvioMaininnat
6601734,806 (3.1)6
In the spirit of the mega-selling On Bullshit, philosopher Aaron James presents a theory of the asshole that is both intellectually provocative and existentially necessary. What does it mean for someone to be an asshole? The answer is not obvious, despite the fact that we are often personally stuck dealing with people for whom there is no better name. Try as we might to avoid them, assholes are found everywhere--at work, at home, on the road, and in the public sphere. Encountering one causes great difficulty and personal strain, especially because we often cannot understand why exactly someone should be acting like that. Asshole management begins with asshole understanding. Much as Machiavelli illuminated political strategy for princes, this book finally gives us the concepts to think or say why assholes disturb us so, and explains why such people seem part of the human social condition, especially in an age of raging narcissism and unbridled capitalism. These concepts are also practically useful, as understanding the asshole we are stuck with helps us think constructively about how to handle problems he (and they are mostly all men) presents. We get a better sense of when the asshole is best resisted, and when he is best ignored--a better sense of what is, and what is not, worth fighting for.… (lisätietoja)
Jäsen:Zylphan
Teoksen nimi:Assholes: A Theory
Kirjailijat:Aaron James (Tekijä)
Info:Anchor (2014), Edition: Reprint, 240 pages
Kokoelmat:Oma kirjasto
Arvio (tähdet):***
Avainsanoja:-

Teostiedot

Assholes: A Theory (tekijä: Aaron James) (2012)

Viimeisimmät tallentajatyksityinen kirjasto, tjrourke, burkegardner, Fareednasser, kellycommapaul, kes78, yates9, jaystainbrook, lwgaylor, theamyjohnson
-
Ladataan...

Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin nähdäksesi, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et.

Ei tämänhetkisiä Keskustelu-viestiketjuja tästä kirjasta.

» Katso myös 6 mainintaa

Näyttää 1-5 (yhteensä 17) (seuraava | näytä kaikki)
Doubleday, which published this book, appears to have seen an opportunity to move some units by wrapping the book in a dust jacket that makes it look like a humor book on the order of, say, Justin Halpern's amusing Sh*t My Dad Says. As several disappointed reviewers in this forum have pointed out, A**holes: A Theory (please forgive the asterisks; I have a G-rated gravatar), isn't that kind of book. It's author, Aaron James, holds a doctorate in philosophy from Harvard; he is on the faculty of the University of California at Irvine. So, this is, in fact, a relatively serious work of philosophy. I use the qualifier relatively, because I imagine Mr. James' colleagues in the academy, at least some of them, would find it difficult to take seriously a philosophical treatise whose title is a barnyard epithet. That said, Mr. James is very clear that this is a work of "pop philosophy," similar to Harry Frankfort's On Bullsh*t (Mr. James cites On Bullsh*t a few times in his text). I rather doubt that either of these scholars shopped these manuscripts around for peer review and journal publication. They're very clear with their readers what these books are and are about.

In any case, I assume for everyone reading this, life has afforded them plenty of opportunity to deal with the personality type this tome's title defines. Chances are good, moreover, that readers of this book have on more than one occasion used this, uh, term of art, either in casual conversation or in abject frustration, to designate an offensive person in their midst.

Mr. James' philosophical project in this book--and he has his tongue at least partially in his cheek as he carries this out--is to determine the fundamental characteristics of a**holes. That accomplished, he continues in a discursive analysis about why the a**hole is so offensive that we find it necessary to, well, freight him or her with such an unfortunately evocative noun.

Needless to say, the book's title makes appearances as many if not most of the parts of speech, sometimes with suffixes--e.g. "a**holish," an adjective I favor in moments of irritation. In some respects, the repetition of the word distracts from, but doesn't attenuate, the force of Mr. James' argument. I did find myself wondering if the book would convey more gravitas if a different term, something perhaps more clinical or scholarly, were used to describe this type of challenging personality.

However, to reiterate, this is a work of pop philosophy (interestingly, if you search the term on the internet, one of the first things to pop up is the Wikipedia entry on "pseudophilosophy"). So the title is probably apt. I don't mean, in emphasizing this relatively new genre--since I don't think professional philosophers would like hearing it called a "new scholarly field"--to diminish this book. There is serious analysis as work here, and Mr. James is a fine stylist who conveys complicated ideas without trivializing them. Anyone who deals with difficult people (as Mr. James points out several times, a**holes are everywhere) will probably find salubrious the stoic approach Mr. James counsels in dealing with them.
  Mark_Feltskog | Dec 23, 2023 |
Dry and philosophical read, not funny. I trudged through the first chapter and got no further. ( )
  BritishKoalaTea | Mar 1, 2022 |
This book gives one a lot to think about.

A reader with at least a passing knowledge is philosophy will get more out of the book than if one has never read Descartes, Kant or Neitchze. The author refers to these and other more obscure philosophers throughout the book. ( )
  Chrissylou62 | Aug 1, 2020 |
Very enjoyable. While the author states that it is less rigorous that a standard philosophical text, it is more rigorous than a typical book aimed at a lay audience. At times, repetitively so, but as you proceed through his arguments and development, that repetition mattered less and helped connect ideas. Copies of this book should be sent to leaders across the range of social institutions in an effort to galvanize pro-social leaders and maybe also serve as an asshole dampening mechanism. ( )
  ltbxf4 | Jul 5, 2020 |
I'm glad I went into this with eyes wide opened as to the widespread prevalence and ubiquitous presence of assholes.

I mean, honestly, we all know one, or two, or sometimes a full office full of them. And even if we don't have many real life line-cutters, traffic-weavers, or conversation killers in our lives, at least we have Trump. And high-level bankers. And Rush. And practically the entire existing vocal portion of the political process in America. We have lots and lots and lots of good examples.

What didn't really have was a comprehensive attempt to define and refine all the aspects about what truly makes up an Asshole. Enter this book. The extremely nerdy logical equivalent of a loud fart. Not humorous in the way most of us like fart jokes, mind you. It's just so nerdy it still had me chuckling the entire time.

Assholes are people with entrenched senses of entitlement.

Pretty easy. They will sometimes give you long winded reasons why they do asshole things, giving lip service to the basic moral equivalency of cooperation and knowing that we're all in the same boat, but they still go ahead and pull an asshole move anyway. Assholes can be that person who always complains to the management when his McD fries aren't fresh enough. They're also the people who perpetuate the idea of the Noblese, making sure you know that you deserve so much more while taking the lion's share of everything. They are the people that we wish we could curtail with laws and restrictions and sanctions, but because the things they're doing are socially reprehensible, and not precisely unlawful, we all just look on in disgust as they get away with it.

Fun stuff.

I most appreciated the sociological ramifications and possible means to put assholes in their place. :)

Totally recommend, dude. Especially for surfers. ( )
  bradleyhorner | Jun 1, 2020 |
Näyttää 1-5 (yhteensä 17) (seuraava | näytä kaikki)
ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu

» Lisää muita tekijöitä

Tekijän nimiRooliTekijän tyyppiKoskeeko teosta?Tila
Aaron Jamesensisijainen tekijäkaikki painoksetlaskettu
Morey, ArthurKertojamuu tekijäeräät painoksetvahvistettu
Sinun täytyy kirjautua sisään voidaksesi muokata Yhteistä tietoa
Katso lisäohjeita Common Knowledge -sivuilta (englanniksi).
Teoksen kanoninen nimi
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
Alkuteoksen nimi
Teoksen muut nimet
Alkuperäinen julkaisuvuosi
Henkilöt/hahmot
Tärkeät paikat
Tärkeät tapahtumat
Kirjaan liittyvät elokuvat
Epigrafi (motto tai mietelause kirjan alussa)
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
If an individual takes a lenient view of the moral law, he may well have a high opinion of himself and be conceited, because he judges himself by a false standard.

-Immanuel Kant, 'Lectures on ethics'
Émile, in considering his rank in the human species and seeing himself so happily placed there, will be tempted to...attribute his happiness to his own merit....This is the error most to be feared, because it is more difficult to destroy.

-Jean Jacques Rousseau, 'Émile'
Do you know who I am?

-A quintessential asshole question
Omistuskirjoitus
Tiedot englanninkielisestä Yhteisestä tiedosta. Muokkaa kotoistaaksesi se omalle kielellesi.
To my parents
Ensimmäiset sanat
Sitaatit
Viimeiset sanat
Erotteluhuomautus
Julkaisutoimittajat
Kirjan kehujat
Alkuteoksen kieli
Kanoninen DDC/MDS
Kanoninen LCC

Viittaukset tähän teokseen muissa lähteissä.

Englanninkielinen Wikipedia (2)

In the spirit of the mega-selling On Bullshit, philosopher Aaron James presents a theory of the asshole that is both intellectually provocative and existentially necessary. What does it mean for someone to be an asshole? The answer is not obvious, despite the fact that we are often personally stuck dealing with people for whom there is no better name. Try as we might to avoid them, assholes are found everywhere--at work, at home, on the road, and in the public sphere. Encountering one causes great difficulty and personal strain, especially because we often cannot understand why exactly someone should be acting like that. Asshole management begins with asshole understanding. Much as Machiavelli illuminated political strategy for princes, this book finally gives us the concepts to think or say why assholes disturb us so, and explains why such people seem part of the human social condition, especially in an age of raging narcissism and unbridled capitalism. These concepts are also practically useful, as understanding the asshole we are stuck with helps us think constructively about how to handle problems he (and they are mostly all men) presents. We get a better sense of when the asshole is best resisted, and when he is best ignored--a better sense of what is, and what is not, worth fighting for.

Kirjastojen kuvailuja ei löytynyt.

Kirjan kuvailu
Yhteenveto haiku-muodossa

Current Discussions

-

Suosituimmat kansikuvat

Pikalinkit

Arvio (tähdet)

Keskiarvo: (3.1)
0.5
1 3
1.5
2 9
2.5 3
3 27
3.5 6
4 14
4.5
5 3

Oletko sinä tämä henkilö?

Tule LibraryThing-kirjailijaksi.

 

Lisätietoja | Ota yhteyttä | LibraryThing.com | Yksityisyyden suoja / Käyttöehdot | Apua/FAQ | Blogi | Kauppa | APIs | TinyCat | Perintökirjastot | Varhaiset kirja-arvostelijat | Yleistieto | 203,228,184 kirjaa! | Yläpalkki: Aina näkyvissä