LyndaInOregon Surrenders to the Inevitable

Okay, I fell off the wagon. In fact, I may have pushed that sucker off the side of the road and set fire to it. Despite my firm resolve to not buy any more yarn until I have at least made a dent in the stash, I ordered enough true-blue worsted to make a cabled cardigan for hubby.

Since it will be a birthday gift for him, I feel justified in counting it as a "gift" purchase, not a yarn purchase. Right?

Of course you can!

I think you did good.
I also said the same thing but I am making 3 Granny square temperature blankets for 3 granddaughters this year and I bought yarn.

Of course that's a gift purchase!

I look forward to seeing the progress you make on the cardigan.

>4 PawsforThought: So far the "progress" involves buying a used copy of the book the pattern was in ($6) and then downloading a free pattern with a shape I like better for him (raglan sleeve as opposed to drop shoulder) and hoping the stitch counts will match up well enough to mosh them together to get the cable pattern I liked worked up in the raglan style.

>5 LyndaInOregon: ooh that sounds fun. From your Rav profile it looks like you're the queen of sweaters so I'm sure you're up to the challenge.

>6 lauralkeet: Sweaters are definitely my major interest. I went through a socks phase and had to quit when the sock drawer got so full I couldn't close it! I make hats & baby things for charity (mostly to use up odd bits & bobs of leftover yarn). I love looking at elaborate shawls, and have made a couple, but realize that I don't wear them. Tried gloves ... once. No, thanks. Tried mittens -- easier to make, but I don't like wearing those, either! Will occasionally tackle a blanket, and always swear never again! at about the three-quarters point, but then I forget (kind of like childbirth, I suppose) and get suckered into another one sooner or later. (Blankets, not children!!!)

>1 LyndaInOregon: I think when it comes to needlecraft, everyone falls off the wagon of those type resolutions.

Gah.

Up there in the very first post in this thread, I mentioned buying yarn for a sweater for hubby. Well, today it went to the Great Frog Pond in the Sky. I didn't like the yarn when it arrived -- I'd bought this brand before, but I they've changed something about it, and that got me off on the wrong foot. (I should have sent it back immediately. 20-20 hindsight is a wonderful thing.)

I was tying to get elements from a couple of different patterns to play nicely together in one new hybrid garment and absolutely could not get the cable placement to come out the way I envisioned. So after struggling with it for 6 weeks and ripping it out three times, I took the yarn to knit group this morning and sold it to one of my knitting buddies for half-price.

Bah-humbug.

OTOH, I finished my Plein Air pullover and it is now blocking.

Not sure what's up next. I cast on some socks but have my eye on another, more spring-ish pullover for me.

And just to make it the end of a perfect day, had a fender-bender in the parking lot. Nobody hurt, but I get to go get body repair estimates Monday. We have a pretty high deductible. There goes the income tax refund!

Congratulations on finishing the pullover! I saw pics on Ravelry and it looks nice. Sorry to read the unhappy yarn story though. And the fender-bender! Ugh.

>9 LyndaInOregon: - For some reason, my browser sometimes doesn't show the picture. Ok - I can see it but I had to open the image in its own tab. That's really pretty. I love the green and pink together.

>9 LyndaInOregon: I didn't notice that little icon linking to a photo! I just happened to be on Ravelry first this morning and the sweater popped up in my "Friends Activity" feed.

>9 LyndaInOregon: I can't see the pic! :(

>13 PawsforThought: - Try a right click and choose "open in another tab" if you're using your browser. That worked for me.

This is the image Lynda linked to in >9 LyndaInOregon:. Her link goes to a Facebook post, which appears to be viewable by anyone, not just her FB friends. Lynda and I are friends on Ravelry so I saw the sweater in my Friends feed over there. The image above is the same message she posted on FB but I got the address from Lynda's Ravelry project page.

Isn't it lovely?

>15 lauralkeet: Thanks for taking the time to re-post for Lynda — it is a beautiful sweater indeed! I was unable to do the "right-click and open in another tab/window" trick on my iPad.

Does "plein air" refer to the pattern work around the neckline? I know embarrassingly little about knitting terms.

It's a nice sweater!

>16 rosalita: Hey Julia, here's your fun fact for the day: plein air is French for the outdoors.

Sorry to hijack your thread, Lynda. Over to you!

>18 lauralkeet: Zweigart has a cross-stitch linen called "plein air." It's a light blue that is a little to the gray side.

>18 lauralkeet: Thanks, Laura. I actually did know that, in relation to painting, mostly. But I wasn't sure if Plein Air was a style like Fair Isle.

Anyway, it's a gorgeous sweater, Lynda!

>16 rosalita: "Plein Air" in this case is just the name of the pattern. If describing it for another knitter, you'd say it was a round-yoke pullover with colorwork in the yoke.

Pattern-makers can come up with interesting names for knitted items. I've made the "No Need to "Panic", "Decked in Diamonds", "Soldotna", "Charade", "Comstock", and "Brookings" sweaters, among many others. Sometimes the pattern name references a feature in the sweater; other times it seems to be just free-association for the designer! And still oher times, the knitter will adopt a name for the pattern that reflects her frustration with the doggone thing -- hence "Jinx" and "Rabid Squirrel" -- two of my more challenging knits!

>21 LyndaInOregon: Thanks, Lynda — and you filled in another blank for me because I could not for the life of me come up with the word "yoke" when I was asking about the pattern. I like some of those pattern names — crafty people are clever!

>15 lauralkeet: That is indeed lovely sweater!

Just finished Peggy Orenstein's Unraveling, which I raced through in a day and a half. Review, from the work page, is here.

Looking at reviews from other members, I see a pretty wide range of responses. It's certainly true that she covers a lot more territory than "it's really hard, stinky work to shear a sheep and prepare its fleece for spinning". Personally, I found most of the byways she wandered down to be interesting and informative. Your mileage may vary!

>24 LyndaInOregon: I just commented over on your 75 thread but hey why not comment here as well eh? Your comments about the other reviews are interesting, and it kinda makes me look forward to reading the book even more.

Dropping in to say "hi".

>26 thornton37814: Hi to you, too! Hope you have an enjoyable Fourth of July planned.

Wow. After months of trying and too many unsuccessful attempts to count, I think I finally got a project photo to load.

Baby dress (obviously) for the great-granddaughter expected in April. Still OTN, a blanket made from the same self-patterning yarn.



Pattern is "Wee Penny".

Looking forward to seeing all your knitting! That baby dress is so sweet.

I have heard a lot of mixed reviews of Unraveling. My aunt really enjoyed it, though a friend of mine heard a lot of criticisms from people she knows who are more involved in the yarn industry.

>28 LyndaInOregon: It will be a gift your granddaughter should cherish (and maybe even preserve in her "cedar chest" if she has one).

>28 LyndaInOregon: Oh, that’s so adorable!

Fibonacci Stripe Pullover, just finished. It's knitted in sportweight, so will be a nice between-seasons sweater.

Very nice! The colors really pop, too.

Love the colors. Great sweater!

>32 LyndaInOregon: Oh, that's really nice. And I like the idea of a Fibonacci stripe - how does it work exactly? Doesn't seem like the stripes are getting wider (which is how I assumed they would be).

>32 LyndaInOregon: Beautiful work!

>32 LyndaInOregon: Love the colors!

>35 PawsforThought: The Fibonacci sequence is formed when two numbers are added together and the sum is then added to the first of the two numbers. (Harder to explain than to demonstrate.) 1+1=2; 2+1=3; 3+2=5; 5+3=8; 8+5=13. It goes on to infinity.

So yes, the stripes do get wider and if you didn't interrupt the sequence, you'd quickly end up with one wide enough to cover whatever was left on the sweater. But I had a bunch of yarn balls of different sizes. I started with two colors (A&B) and when one (A) ran out, I'd start the sequence all over again with one row of a new color (C) and one row of whatever was left of B. Again, easier to do than explain.

It's a technique I've used often on scrap projects, which this one essentially was. Always fun to see how the stripes turn out.

>38 LyndaInOregon: I know how the Fibonacci sequence works, that’s why I was wondering about the stripes.
So its the first part of the sequence repeated, then? Makes sense.

Wow, that's so gorgeous!