*FREE* edition of Folio 75 now available
KeskusteluFolio Society Devotees
Liity LibraryThingin jäseneksi, niin voit kirjoittaa viestin.
1FranklyMyDarling
Am I the first to the party, or am I late? I was just able to download Folio 75: The Complete Bibliography of The Folio Society, 1947-2022 on the FS website—all 758 glorious pages!
2mr.philistine
For those who do not wish to 'sign up' to receive access, here is the direct link:
https://issuu.com/thefoliosocietymagazine/docs/folio_75_text
https://issuu.com/thefoliosocietymagazine/docs/folio_75_text
3adriano77
>2 mr.philistine: Really useful, thanks for the link.
5sdolton
>1 FranklyMyDarling: just downloaded as well, can't thank you enough. Much appreciated.
6wcarter
Don't forget that a complete list of Folio Society books already exists at -
https://wiki.librarything.com/index.php/Groups:BOOKS_PUBLISHED_BY_THE_FOLIO_SOCI...
This list is kept up to date with all new editions, has pictures of every book and reviews of over 300 books.
https://wiki.librarything.com/index.php/Groups:BOOKS_PUBLISHED_BY_THE_FOLIO_SOCI...
This list is kept up to date with all new editions, has pictures of every book and reviews of over 300 books.
8folio_books
>7 Shadekeep:
Igot "File not downloaded - security risk"
You might want to take a look at that. I'm using Firefox on a Mac.
Igot "File not downloaded - security risk"
You might want to take a look at that. I'm using Firefox on a Mac.
9Shadekeep
>8 folio_books: Probably because I don't have an SSL cert on the site anymore (I don't actively maintain it these days, but use it as a file dumping ground). I can put it up on a fileshare site you need, though it should be safe to download. Some browsers are just more picky about the lack of a cert or the filetype. The CSV is the safest format, since it's plain text. Excel could theoretically contain a virus, though I know my copy doesn't.
See this article for why you might get this message: https://superuser.com/questions/1682451/disable-firefox-blocking-of-http-downloa...
See this article for why you might get this message: https://superuser.com/questions/1682451/disable-firefox-blocking-of-http-downloa...
11gistak
Hello, I understand that this message is late, but I didn't think I should start a whole new thread. Does anyone know what "not seen" means in the bibliography? I've seen it several times.
For example, for Animal Farm, it lists the first printing, and then has this list of other printings. The second, eighth, ninth, tenth, and sixteenth all say "not seen."
¶ Second impression: 1985 (not seen). ¶ Third impression: 1988, printed and bound by the Bath Press. ¶ Fourth impression: 1989. ¶ Fifth printing: 1991. ¶ Sixth printing: 1992. ¶ Seventh printing: 1994. ¶ Eighth printing: (not seen). ¶ Ninth printing: (not seen). ¶ Tenth printing: (not seen). ¶ Eleventh printing: 1996. ¶ Twelfth printing: 1997. ¶ Thirteenth printing: 1998, with a brown slip case. Spine-lettering redesigned. ¶ Fourteenth printing: 2000. ¶ Fifteenth printing: 2002, with an orange slip case. ¶ Sixteenth printing: 2002 (not seen). ¶ Seventeenth printing: 2012, the dimensions now 227 × 161 × 16 mm and Akzidenz Grotesque
For example, for Animal Farm, it lists the first printing, and then has this list of other printings. The second, eighth, ninth, tenth, and sixteenth all say "not seen."
¶ Second impression: 1985 (not seen). ¶ Third impression: 1988, printed and bound by the Bath Press. ¶ Fourth impression: 1989. ¶ Fifth printing: 1991. ¶ Sixth printing: 1992. ¶ Seventh printing: 1994. ¶ Eighth printing: (not seen). ¶ Ninth printing: (not seen). ¶ Tenth printing: (not seen). ¶ Eleventh printing: 1996. ¶ Twelfth printing: 1997. ¶ Thirteenth printing: 1998, with a brown slip case. Spine-lettering redesigned. ¶ Fourteenth printing: 2000. ¶ Fifteenth printing: 2002, with an orange slip case. ¶ Sixteenth printing: 2002 (not seen). ¶ Seventeenth printing: 2012, the dimensions now 227 × 161 × 16 mm and Akzidenz Grotesque
12wcarter
>11 gistak:
It means the bibliographer employed by the FS has not seen a copy and that the FS do not have a copy in their archives
It means the bibliographer employed by the FS has not seen a copy and that the FS do not have a copy in their archives
13gistak
>12 wcarter: Got it, thanks!
15jsg1976
Per a recent Folio Society blog entry, an interview with the FS librarian (https://www.foliosociety.com/usa/blog/this-folio-life-the-folio-library/), they intend to update the bibliography annually.
“In fact, I have started adding the books published this year to the list and we aim to release an updated bibliography annually from this point forward.”
“In fact, I have started adding the books published this year to the list and we aim to release an updated bibliography annually from this point forward.”