Liity LibraryThingin jäseneksi, niin voit kirjoittaa viestin.
Tämä viestiketju on "uinuva" —viimeisin viesti on vanhempi kuin 90 päivää. Ryhmä "virkoaa", kun lähetät vastauksen.
First pick was July's People by Nadine Gordimer. Despite having never read anything by her before, I've got a couple of her books in the stack. High expectations.
A black servant (July) hides his white employeers in his village after black South Africans rebel. So far it's not gripping, but perfectly readable. The children seem dehumanized to me, and the white couple are a bit annoying. July is more of a mystery, probably because not knowing what he's thinking adds suspense.
BTW, if you'd like to discuss your new-to-you writers of 2017, there's a thread going on just that subject in the "All Writers Considered" Group. Please join us!
All are welcome!
Looking forward to seeing your reading discoveries this year.
>1 Settings: no need to feel shame! Progress is progress and your efforts are all that matter!
Finished July's People. Definitely complex.
Currently on track. :)
Next up will be The Talented Mr. Ripley by Patricia Highsmith.
Edit- Realized Ripley is a series. Speedboat by Renata Adler then.
The Return Journey by Maeve Binchy
Fondle the Yellow Bite on the Grewn by Audrey Cooke
The Rules of Life by Fay Weldon
I Will Say Beauty by Carol Frost
The Purple Potato by Rachel Guido DeVries
Canzoniere by Isabella Morra, translated by Irene Musillo Mitchelle.
64 pg bilingual edition. :P
The introduction claims that Morra should be considered on of the best female poets of the renaissance. Personally, I'm not getting it. The poems are autobiographical, and not understandable without the introduction. I'm certain the Italian is better - the strict form isn't translated.
R.U.R. by Capek was interesting, but because of my female author challenge I haven't read a book with its brand of sexism in a very long time. It makes me sad.
"Helena: Perhaps its silly of me, but why do you manufacture female Robots when - when -
Domin: Sex means nothing to them?
Domin: There's a certain demand for them, you see. Servants, saleswomen, stenographers. People are used to it."
Yes, because the appropriate question isn't "why give robots gender," it's "why manufacture female Robots."
That was extremely dramatic. This was supposedly very controversal, but it was 1881, and there's a lot of implications that in a modern work would be stated outright.
The conversation with the hypocrite priest about double standards for men and women - a fallen women is a blight upon the home and is irredeemable while a fallen man needs to be coddled by his family so he can recover is copied in Amelie Skram's Constance Ring.
Can't say I'm getting much out of them, but I suppose a read-through will help me understand any preformances I might watch. I dread the fool characters. So many jokes I don't get.
I personally can't count a book as read unless I read the introduction. Unfortunately my brain seems to have categorized Shakespeare introductions as both uninteresting and unimportant. I've read so many yet fail to remember what they say. This one's a Signet classic edition - at only 50 pages the introduction's not so bad - but it's followed by 100 pages of commentaries.
Yeah, I leave the introduction for last unless I don't think I'll understand the book otherwise.
I'm listening to the audiobook of Independent People. It wasn't clear where the introduction ended, so I gambled. Introduction writer proceeded to talk about the joy of discovering a book that isn't one of the "greats", approaching it without all that foreknowledge, then discovering something that speaks to him on a deep level. Then they began to summarize the plot. Such a contradiction.
Certain things didn't happen as I expected, so I was plenty confused. Introduction and commentaries suggested the things that confused me were flaws in the play. Lots of Shakespeare introductions seem to focus on "flaws" in the play. Another reason to skip them, I suppose, hard to look forward to a play you've just been told is bad.
Beneath the Red Banner by Lao She
A semi-autographical novel about Lao She's family set before the Boxer Rebellion. It was setting up to be his magnum opus, but Lao She died prematurely so it cuts off abruptly. Such a loss. Lao She is fabulously witty and satirical and the drama never becomes boring. I was very pleased to find this at a library booksale.
Lao She and his relatives were ethnic Manchu. The Manchu people invaded China from Manchuria and were the ruling class for centuries until the fall of the Qing dynasty in the early 20th century. Various male relatives were "bannermen" who lived in Beijing and received monthly allowances for existing. Despite the free money, they continually spend beyond their means, a situation half caused by certain family members' selfishness and short-sightedness, and half caused by the high cost of remaining respectable.
There's a character involved in the Boxer movement and it might be a good study on overall disatisfaction, but Lao She never got to the actual rebellion.
It would be $15 though for a very short unfinished book. Could you try ILL?
Interplanetary science fiction with humans and two types of aliens: Mri and Regul. The Mri have worked as mercenaries for the non-combatant Regul for millennia. Before the novels begin, Regul have surrendered to humans and ceded the Mri homeworld as part of the peace treaty. Cherryh's aliens are markedly non-human, but there's enough familiarity that their actions are logically interpretable. Saying anything about their psychology would spoil things because the details are spread out.
The second half of the first novel was riveting, but the rest of it not so much. This is part of Cherryh's Alliance-Union Universe, which I've started reading in publication order. The previous one, Hunter of Worlds, was more difficult for me to follow than Shakespeare because of the intensely alien characters. In this one, the human characters and their interpretations are more present, there is less alien vocab, and the aliens aren't quite so alien.
Had a fun time rearranging my bookcases in a reading order. More of a fantasy than anything I think I'll actually do, but decided to finish up authors I'd read before in alphabetical order, alternating books by male and female authors.
So the A's would be Isabel Allende, Margaret Atwood, Chinua Achebe, Douglas Adams, and Isaac Asimov.
There's nothing quite like bookshelf-arranging, is there? I think you'll find a lot of people here relate to that!
Committed now to finishing A Tale of Genji before next year. On page 911/1090, so the end is in sight. Possibly been trying to read this since 2008.
It's not a bad book, but it's not written with outsiders in mind and accepting that I'm not going to understand takes patience. This quote (no spoilers) really summarizes the novel for me-
"The prescribed silver dishes were laid out most grandly on eight stands, and there were two smaller stands as well, and the ceremonial rice cakes were brought on trays with the festoon-shaped legs so much in style. But enough: why should I describe arrangements with which everyone is perfectly familiar?" (pg. 903)
Going to read the book my brother got me for Christmas, Sleeping Beauties by Stephen/Owen King. To spoil the premise, there is a sudden outbreak of a mysterious illness where woman (only woman) who fall asleep become covered in a mysterious white cocoon and do not wake up by themselves. If woken up by force they react violently. There's a large variety of both male and female POVs representing different faces of the town. Hoping that there's going to be some kind of plot development so we don't lose all the female POVs.