Spam reporting thread #42
Tämä viestiketju jatkaa tätä viestiketjua: Spam reporting thread #41.
Tämä viestiketju jatkuu täällä: Spam reporting thread #43.
KeskusteluSpam Fighters!
Liity LibraryThingin jäseneksi, niin voit kirjoittaa viestin.
Tämä viestiketju on "uinuva" —viimeisin viesti on vanhempi kuin 90 päivää. Ryhmä "virkoaa", kun lähetät vastauksen.
1Lyndatrue
Procedures for reporting spam
Distinguish between the following, and flag the highest level of the violation:
-- Type 1: Irredeemable commercial spam: make sure to flag the member's profile, as well as the spammy activity. This type includes things selling strollers, pharmaceuticals, live-streaming sports games, porn, and/or trying to create traffic/links to sites for such things. Sufficient profile flags will automatically result in temporary suspension and deletion of the member's activity, so use your profile-flagging powers wisely and carefully.
-- Type 2: Teachable moments: DO NOT flag the member's profile, but DO flag the violating activity (e.g. self-promotional Talk post, group, or local venue). This type includes promotional activity that violates the Terms of Service (TOS), but where the member is potentially redeemable, e.g. overzealous authors, overzealous publishers, or other members with small TOS violations but who are otherwise using the site legitimately. These cases should be reported to staff (by sending a message or email to staff and/or or posting on this thread), so the member can be taught how to use the site.
Specific procedures:
-- Overzealous authors or publishers (these fall under type 2): do NOT flag the member's profile. Report to staff here or privately. You can also send the member a polite message pointing them to the terms, mentioning the "no promoting" language, and pointing them to the Do's and Don't page for authors: http://www.librarything.com/about_authors.php
-- Suspected sock-puppetry to promote a book, write fake reviews, and/or stack ratings: do not flag the profile, but report to staff here or by message, so staff can investigate. This is a serious violation for which members can be permanently banned.
-- Profile flags for commercial spammers only (type 1): On the member's profile page, click on the "report for spam" link, then follow instructions to flag the member. Again, this is only for commercial spam, not for "overzealous" authors, publishers, or booksellers, which should be reported to staff instead. See Talk post: http://www.librarything.com/topic/85810
-- Spam or promotional posts in a Talk topic (type 1 or 2): flag the post as an abuse of the terms of service.
-- Spam or promotional groups (types 1 and 2): flag new groups using the "flag this group" link.
-- Spam lists: report in this thread, and flag the member if it's commercial spam.
-- Spam works (type 1 spam): flag the work as spam on the work's editions page, and then vote on proposed work spam. Make sure to read the guidelines before proposing or voting, especially for what is not spam. Voting page: http://www.librarything.com/spam_works.php
-- Spam in a review (type 1), or an explicitly promotional review (type 2): flag the review as an abuse of the TOS, using the red flag.
-- Spam or promotion in "published reviews," or other CK fields (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete.
-- Spam or egregious promotion/advertising in venues or events (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete. Note that authors are permitted to add events for their books.
-- Spam in book links / quick links: post here and/or edit to remove spam.
-- Spam author names listed on a work: No current procedure. Tim has asked us not to change CK to indicate spammers, and not to combine spam authors together.
-- Not sure if it's spam? Post here, and explain why.
Please note that Tim has asked us not to use either CK or the combining system (whether works or authors) for spam fighting.
For more information see these wiki pages:
Procedures for flagging and reporting spam: http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Spam#Procedures_for_flagging_and_repo...
Spam works, guidelines for flagging and voting: http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/HelpThing:Spam_works
(A copy of these guidelines, for pasting in new threads, can be found here or at the top of previous threads.)
Distinguish between the following, and flag the highest level of the violation:
-- Type 1: Irredeemable commercial spam: make sure to flag the member's profile, as well as the spammy activity. This type includes things selling strollers, pharmaceuticals, live-streaming sports games, porn, and/or trying to create traffic/links to sites for such things. Sufficient profile flags will automatically result in temporary suspension and deletion of the member's activity, so use your profile-flagging powers wisely and carefully.
-- Type 2: Teachable moments: DO NOT flag the member's profile, but DO flag the violating activity (e.g. self-promotional Talk post, group, or local venue). This type includes promotional activity that violates the Terms of Service (TOS), but where the member is potentially redeemable, e.g. overzealous authors, overzealous publishers, or other members with small TOS violations but who are otherwise using the site legitimately. These cases should be reported to staff (by sending a message or email to staff and/or or posting on this thread), so the member can be taught how to use the site.
Specific procedures:
-- Overzealous authors or publishers (these fall under type 2): do NOT flag the member's profile. Report to staff here or privately. You can also send the member a polite message pointing them to the terms, mentioning the "no promoting" language, and pointing them to the Do's and Don't page for authors: http://www.librarything.com/about_authors.php
-- Suspected sock-puppetry to promote a book, write fake reviews, and/or stack ratings: do not flag the profile, but report to staff here or by message, so staff can investigate. This is a serious violation for which members can be permanently banned.
-- Profile flags for commercial spammers only (type 1): On the member's profile page, click on the "report for spam" link, then follow instructions to flag the member. Again, this is only for commercial spam, not for "overzealous" authors, publishers, or booksellers, which should be reported to staff instead. See Talk post: http://www.librarything.com/topic/85810
-- Spam or promotional posts in a Talk topic (type 1 or 2): flag the post as an abuse of the terms of service.
-- Spam or promotional groups (types 1 and 2): flag new groups using the "flag this group" link.
-- Spam lists: report in this thread, and flag the member if it's commercial spam.
-- Spam works (type 1 spam): flag the work as spam on the work's editions page, and then vote on proposed work spam. Make sure to read the guidelines before proposing or voting, especially for what is not spam. Voting page: http://www.librarything.com/spam_works.php
-- Spam in a review (type 1), or an explicitly promotional review (type 2): flag the review as an abuse of the TOS, using the red flag.
-- Spam or promotion in "published reviews," or other CK fields (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete.
-- Spam or egregious promotion/advertising in venues or events (type 1 or 2): post here and/or delete. Note that authors are permitted to add events for their books.
-- Spam in book links / quick links: post here and/or edit to remove spam.
-- Spam author names listed on a work: No current procedure. Tim has asked us not to change CK to indicate spammers, and not to combine spam authors together.
-- Not sure if it's spam? Post here, and explain why.
Please note that Tim has asked us not to use either CK or the combining system (whether works or authors) for spam fighting.
For more information see these wiki pages:
Procedures for flagging and reporting spam: http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/Spam#Procedures_for_flagging_and_repo...
Spam works, guidelines for flagging and voting: http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.php/HelpThing:Spam_works
(A copy of these guidelines, for pasting in new threads, can be found here or at the top of previous threads.)
22wonderY
Starting with an old classic:
favorite books for 4th graders
http://www.librarything.com/topic/196854
http://www.librarything.com/profile/shojrnx3852ur
favorite books for 4th graders
http://www.librarything.com/topic/196854
http://www.librarything.com/profile/shojrnx3852ur
7MarthaJeanne
The Koreans or whoever are at it again.
http://www.librarything.com/profile/machulsoon
6:54 Currently 21 Topics.
6:56 Over 30
http://www.librarything.com/profile/machulsoon
6:54 Currently 21 Topics.
6:56 Over 30
9MarthaJeanne
Now http://www.librarything.com/profile/myungsuck132 is doing it.
Over 40 and coming faster than I can flag.
Over 40 and coming faster than I can flag.
11MarthaJeanne
Someone is trying to be tricky
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197081#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/dinama120
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197081#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/dinama120
14CurrerBell
http://www.librarything.com/profile/kizsme205
Twenty spam posts in some language and character set I don't understand but clearly a promotion for some website called 660box.com
Twenty spam posts in some language and character set I don't understand but clearly a promotion for some website called 660box.com
16Yamanekotei
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197152
http://www.librarything.com/profile/annaj49
Elife E8 with Android 5.1 Lollipop!!
http://www.librarything.com/profile/annaj49
Elife E8 with Android 5.1 Lollipop!!
20Yamanekotei
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197188
http://www.librarything.com/profile/briiteeye
"at the world economy no"
http://www.librarything.com/profile/briiteeye
"at the world economy no"
21lesmel
Ok, an author just went a little crazy:
http://www.librarything.com/profile/Daniel13fife
http://www.librarything.com/topic/92862#5294603
http://www.librarything.com/topic/173992#5294608
http://www.librarything.com/topic/103229#5294610
http://www.librarything.com/topic/152466#5294611
http://www.librarything.com/topic/132992#5294614
And is still going......
ETA: S/He was warned yesterday by lilithcat
ETA2:
http://www.librarything.com/topic/59143#5294615
http://www.librarything.com/topic/52399#5294618
http://www.librarything.com/profile/Daniel13fife
http://www.librarything.com/topic/92862#5294603
http://www.librarything.com/topic/173992#5294608
http://www.librarything.com/topic/103229#5294610
http://www.librarything.com/topic/152466#5294611
http://www.librarything.com/topic/132992#5294614
And is still going......
ETA: S/He was warned yesterday by lilithcat
ETA2:
http://www.librarything.com/topic/59143#5294615
http://www.librarything.com/topic/52399#5294618
22MarthaJeanne
He's been removed now.
26Lyndatrue
>25 tardis: Yes, the Korean spam bot seems to be back.
Hopefully http://www.librarything.com/profile/FvRbVg will be flagged into submission. I've flagged all the posts, but I'm the only flag on many of them.
ETA: I just don't have the energy. I've already fought enough fires today to last for a while.
Hopefully someone else besides you and I shows up...
Hopefully http://www.librarything.com/profile/FvRbVg will be flagged into submission. I've flagged all the posts, but I'm the only flag on many of them.
ETA: I just don't have the energy. I've already fought enough fires today to last for a while.
Hopefully someone else besides you and I shows up...
27Mr.Durick
I'm going to start flagging these things, but I think maybe something is taming them so they'll be gone before I'm done. If not I'll have done my part.
Robert
Robert
28Lyndatrue
>26 Lyndatrue: Flag the profile first. Pretty please.
ETA: It takes four flags (far as I can tell, that works for the profile too).
ETA: It takes four flags (far as I can tell, that works for the profile too).
30Mr.Durick
I got the profile, but when I click on 'flag' the screen jerks, but I don't get the opportunity to do it. I'll try Chrome instead.
Robert
P.S. I flagged a few over half of them then got 'This User Removed as Spam' which keeps us from flagging them into non-existence.
R
Robert
P.S. I flagged a few over half of them then got 'This User Removed as Spam' which keeps us from flagging them into non-existence.
R
31Lyndatrue
>30 Mr.Durick: Someone probably needs to nudge a staff person. I'm about to go fall down, so it isn't me. I hate spammers. Hate hate hate.
ETA: Huh. Never mind. All gone. Thank you, mysterious cleaner upper.
ETA: Huh. Never mind. All gone. Thank you, mysterious cleaner upper.
402wonderY
Spam profile picture:
http://www.librarything.com/pic/5019740
http://www.librarything.com/profile/everboy
http://www.librarything.com/pic/5019740
http://www.librarything.com/profile/everboy
43lilithcat
This looks like something to keep an eye on, although it may be just someone trying to figure out the site. (I note that he has a number of legit books catalogued - including a book by Leslea Newman with which I was not familiar! I may have to thank him.)
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197284
https://www.librarything.com/profile/azzaaa
https://www.librarything.com/groups/information1
https://www.librarything.com/groups/info
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197284
https://www.librarything.com/profile/azzaaa
https://www.librarything.com/groups/information1
https://www.librarything.com/groups/info
44henkl
>43 lilithcat: All gone now.
45lilithcat
>44 henkl:
~sigh~
I think I'll stop posting these "keep an eye on" ones. Guns seem to get jumped. He hadn't actually done anything yet.
~sigh~
I think I'll stop posting these "keep an eye on" ones. Guns seem to get jumped. He hadn't actually done anything yet.
46Taphophile13
offering free book on Amazon
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197312#
ETA: I see he has been told about the proper way for authors to use LT.
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197312#
ETA: I see he has been told about the proper way for authors to use LT.
48MarthaJeanne
>46 Taphophile13: I'm not flagging the profile this time, but since he obviously also spammed in June. That was https://www.librarything.com/profile/railroadcity
49Taphophile13
>48 MarthaJeanne:
No, I didn't list or flag the profile but he does bear watching.
No, I didn't list or flag the profile but he does bear watching.
50MarthaJeanne
Lorannen has now messaged him. See also her message to me.
512wonderY
You'll note that I mentioned to him in June that rating his own book was not a good idea. He seems to have down-rated it from 5 stars to 1 star. Not the brightest.
52MarthaJeanne
He is also listed as LT author on a disambiguation page. I have now moved his book from unknown to 15, and told Lorrannen that his LT author needs to be moved. How that was supposed to be good publicity...
As you say, not the brightest.
As you say, not the brightest.
53Yamanekotei
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197351
http://www.librarything.com/profile/SVbbfd
라이브바카라┏ ▲┓660BOX.COM ┏ ▲┓라이브바카
...again...
http://www.librarything.com/profile/SVbbfd
라이브바카라┏ ▲┓660BOX.COM ┏ ▲┓라이브바카
...again...
56MarthaJeanne
http://www.librarything.com/profile/cruiseja867
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197357
The box com people seem to have figured out that long batches don't do any good.
Wrong. They were just warming up. I'll flag the spammers and the first spam from each name.
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197357
The box com people seem to have figured out that long batches don't do any good.
Wrong. They were just warming up. I'll flag the spammers and the first spam from each name.
57Yamanekotei
Now they are doing double dipping using multiple accounts.
59Lyndatrue
New one: Those others disappeared quickly.
http://www.librarything.com/profile/hjukju25
ETA: Even though the one Korean spam by this account is gone, that profile should still be flagged (or else it will just wake up in a bit, and start over).
http://www.librarything.com/profile/hjukju25
ETA: Even though the one Korean spam by this account is gone, that profile should still be flagged (or else it will just wake up in a bit, and start over).
60rodneyvc
Is this spam - http://www.librarything.com/topic/197373
64PawsforThought
Someone's a big fan of Selena Gomez...
682wonderY
No longer posting, but the profile is still up. ??
9 posts before halting. I've changed tactics and went to the profile first to flag it.
9 posts before halting. I've changed tactics and went to the profile first to flag it.
70lilithcat
>68 2wonderY:
Both profiles are now gone.
I've changed tactics and went to the profile first to flag it.
That's what I've been doing. I think with so many spam posts, in so short a time, flagging the profile gets rid of them more quickly than trying to keep up with the posts.
Both profiles are now gone.
I've changed tactics and went to the profile first to flag it.
That's what I've been doing. I think with so many spam posts, in so short a time, flagging the profile gets rid of them more quickly than trying to keep up with the posts.
71Lyndatrue
>70 lilithcat: With the bots, four flags on the profile is worth far more than flagging the posts themselves. I started using that tactic a couple of evenings ago. I've seen this same type of thing in a couple of other places. I'm beginning to think that LT ought to consider some sort of delay after account creation (at least for Free accounts) before posting is allowed. Human beings will understand the words "Welcome to LT! Have a look around. Due to the account restrictions placed on accounts, you won't be able to join in on conversations for 24 hours."
It could probably be worded much better, but that's the general idea.
It could probably be worded much better, but that's the general idea.
72.Monkey.
Forcing people who come here to post book queries to wait 24 hrs is going to drive off more people than it invites. Definitely not a good thing for any site wanting new members. A simple limit on how many posts, especially within time periods (no one brand new needs to post more than twice in 10 minutes), new members can make would be quite sufficient.
A different site I used to use had what the owner called "system trust." Once you were an established member of the site, i.e. gained the system's trust, you had no restrictions (which of course already included everyone who was active when it was put in place), but until you had established yourself as a legit member of the community (here, that would essentially be adding books, and posting in Talk w/o receiving flags) you were only allowed basic access to things.
A different site I used to use had what the owner called "system trust." Once you were an established member of the site, i.e. gained the system's trust, you had no restrictions (which of course already included everyone who was active when it was put in place), but until you had established yourself as a legit member of the community (here, that would essentially be adding books, and posting in Talk w/o receiving flags) you were only allowed basic access to things.
73Lyndatrue
>72 .Monkey.: I'm sure you're right (about driving people off). The problem with limiting posts is that it will stop (or at least slow down) the 660 bot folks, but not all those live streaming things. They tend to just make a single post (sometimes with hundreds of lines).
A draconian fix for what is a temporary problem (Korean bots) is almost certainly not the right solution. Still, I'd like to see something that would help.
I do note that LT already seems to have something of the sort (re: system trust), here, on this list. There are many people (that are long time posters) who post spam topic/spam profile posts, and I usually flag the post first, and then look to see if the topic's still there. If it's someone that I don't usually see post such things, I look at the topic first (often it's already gone).
That would probably be better termed "group trust" than "system trust" but it's still there.
A draconian fix for what is a temporary problem (Korean bots) is almost certainly not the right solution. Still, I'd like to see something that would help.
I do note that LT already seems to have something of the sort (re: system trust), here, on this list. There are many people (that are long time posters) who post spam topic/spam profile posts, and I usually flag the post first, and then look to see if the topic's still there. If it's someone that I don't usually see post such things, I look at the topic first (often it's already gone).
That would probably be better termed "group trust" than "system trust" but it's still there.
74.Monkey.
Yes, Tim & co did implement that in a spam-fighter capacity, but not in the general sense.
75MsMaryAnn
When we last had a big problem with spam, Tim did implement a priority flagging system for long time, "trusted" spam fighters. My rule for the usual spam or author promos is to check the post first to confirm it is spam and then flag the profile, or in the case of over zealous authors, I leave a message directing them to LT links that are appropriate. When the 660Box Korean Bots appear I have been flagging the profile first.
76.Monkey.
Yes, that is what Lyndatrue was referring to, that was around a year and a half or so ago, sometime a bit before I poofed for ~a year. But it's only about those of us fighting the spam, nothing about those making the spam. Who also should need to have "system trust" before having the ability to do such things.
80lilithcat
>72 .Monkey.:
Forcing people who come here to post book queries to wait 24 hrs is going to drive off more people than it invites.
I'd worry about that more if I ever saw any of those "I'm looking for a book" people return to the site.
Forcing people who come here to post book queries to wait 24 hrs is going to drive off more people than it invites.
I'd worry about that more if I ever saw any of those "I'm looking for a book" people return to the site.
81Lyndatrue
Speaking of fourth graders
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197474#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/shogkam4876ur
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197474#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/shogkam4876ur
82.Monkey.
>80 lilithcat: I do agree on a personal level, the neverending "name that book" posts in book talk make me want to scream, but I know that Tim doesn't see it that way. Hell, he just gifted a lifetime subscription to some person who'd dropped by at some point in the past and done an upload and not used the site since, and now came back wanting to win (hence review) ER books but couldn't since their 200 spots were used. Anything that diminishes the likelihood of people returning, he would definitely not go for.
Also, there are n00bs who legit join and want to post a hello or ask how to do something, and if they had to wait 24 hours to do so, well, it's rather unwelcoming behavior.
Also, there are n00bs who legit join and want to post a hello or ask how to do something, and if they had to wait 24 hours to do so, well, it's rather unwelcoming behavior.
83Taphophile13
"favorite books" livestream
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197478#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/shogtwi3871ur
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197478#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/shogtwi3871ur
84MsMaryAnn
>82 .Monkey.: If I am not mistaken, you speak of two very different posts. If Tim wants to extend or as you say "gift" an account so be it. I'm happy for the recipients. I wouldn't trod on that. Who would?
88henkl
>87 Yamanekotei: Gone, already
90Mr.Durick
Gone. So do we need to flag the messages anymore, or is some process working that lets us just leave it at flagging the propagator?
Robert
Robert
93MarthaJeanne
http://www.librarything.com/groups/enhancedrecoveryands
http://www.librarything.com/profile/craftygrtlcy
>90 Mr.Durick: It's fine just to flag the member. I like to flag one or two messages, too, because it makes it easier for others to see that others are flagging. We don't get that feedback on the profile.
http://www.librarything.com/profile/craftygrtlcy
>90 Mr.Durick: It's fine just to flag the member. I like to flag one or two messages, too, because it makes it easier for others to see that others are flagging. We don't get that feedback on the profile.
94MarthaJeanne
And one in Early Reviewers
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197580#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/sizzlingqueen31
Gone. That was fast.
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197580#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/sizzlingqueen31
Gone. That was fast.
95Lyndatrue
>90 Mr.Durick: I'd say that it depends on the 660 bots, flagging the profile first is the most important, and I'm with MarthaJeanne on flagging a few messages (if there's time) to let others know that someone sees them. I prefer to post it here first though.
On normal spam (and it really hurts to type such a thing), I flag the topic (or group) first, and then the profile, and then post them here. There may be something automated going on in the background that helps with the 660 bot; I wouldn't want to depend on it for the other stuff.
I'm sure that we won't hear commentary from staff on this, on the premise that not discussing specifics is best.
On normal spam (and it really hurts to type such a thing), I flag the topic (or group) first, and then the profile, and then post them here. There may be something automated going on in the background that helps with the 660 bot; I wouldn't want to depend on it for the other stuff.
I'm sure that we won't hear commentary from staff on this, on the premise that not discussing specifics is best.
101Taphophile13
bot profiles need flagging:
https://www.librarything.com/profile/JESSAE28
https://www.librarything.com/profile/FdFNbM
https://www.librarything.com/profile/JESSAE28
https://www.librarything.com/profile/FdFNbM
102Lyndatrue
Almost gone (the only ones left were from https://www.librarything.com/profile/FdFNbM) but there's a new one:
http://www.librarything.com/profile/DEERTYUI28
(660 bot)
ETA: All gone for now.
http://www.librarything.com/profile/DEERTYUI28
(660 bot)
ETA: All gone for now.
103Taphophile13
a new 660 bot just showed up
please flag the profile
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197728#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/DEERTYUI28
please flag the profile
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197728#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/DEERTYUI28
120Taphophile13
OK, the onslaught has begun again:
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197904#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/astywshe
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197904#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/astywshe
125Jarandel
www.librarything.com/topic/197924
http://www.librarything.com/profile/kalmilata130
http://www.librarything.com/profile/kalmilata130
126Jarandel
www.librarything.com/topic/197939
http://www.librarything.com/profile/bdciydici
http://www.librarything.com/profile/bdciydici
128Taphophile13
they finally made it to fifth grade:
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197950#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/shodmao3982ur
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197950#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/shodmao3982ur
130Lyndatrue
>129 torontoc: Please remember on this type of spam to include the profile as well.
Thanks.
https://www.librarything.com/profile/greentea120
Thanks.
https://www.librarything.com/profile/greentea120
133Taphophile13
"interesting books to read"
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197955#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/shovjhw3987ur
https://www.librarything.com/topic/197955#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/shovjhw3987ur
136tardis
http://www.librarything.com/topic/197969#
http://www.librarything.com/profile/dsdswserwsrew
many threads in Book Talk - 550BOX.COM
http://www.librarything.com/profile/dsdswserwsrew
many threads in Book Talk - 550BOX.COM
141MarthaJeanne
Well, that one's gone. Until the next one comes.
142Yamanekotei
Re 136
http://www.librarything.com/profile/dsdswserwsrew
It is still alive. It has been two hours since. What's wrong with it?
http://www.librarything.com/profile/dsdswserwsrew
It is still alive. It has been two hours since. What's wrong with it?
143MarthaJeanne
Looks suspended to me.
157.Monkey.
There were at least 5 I think, but yeah, enough people on to give all the flags right away. :)
164Yamanekotei
>163 Mr.Durick:
online textbook rental company?
online textbook rental company?
167henkl
>166 henkl: Gone after about nine messages.
169henkl
>168 henkl: 10 messages this time.
172Yamanekotei
Still alive after ten minutes...
176Taphophile13
word salad suddenly became links
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198256
https://www.librarything.com/profile/honeyybnny
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198256
https://www.librarything.com/profile/honeyybnny
178Lyndatrue
Bots
http://www.librarything.com/profile/segsgdgdetj
ETA: I'm sure that this won't be the end of it tonight.
http://www.librarything.com/profile/segsgdgdetj
ETA: I'm sure that this won't be the end of it tonight.
179henkl
>178 Lyndatrue: Or this morning.
180MarthaJeanne
Yes, the bots are back. http://www.librarything.com/profile/gcgcgccsahf
See also
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198276
http://www.librarything.com/profile/rubysmith085
for regular spam.
See also
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198276
http://www.librarything.com/profile/rubysmith085
for regular spam.
188lilithcat
Another bot:
https://www.librarything.com/profile/hookluckchu
ETA: Oh, good work guys! Gone even as I typed.
https://www.librarything.com/profile/hookluckchu
ETA: Oh, good work guys! Gone even as I typed.
1902wonderY
not the usual Book Talk post
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198504
http://www.librarything.com/profile/ramrama120
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198504
http://www.librarything.com/profile/ramrama120
191Taphophile13
multiple 5505box threads
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198529#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/gjtyrgdf
ETA: already gone!
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198529#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/gjtyrgdf
ETA: already gone!
192Lyndatrue
bot profile
http://www.librarything.com/profile/hfjjtyun
ETA: I note that this one is posting more slowly than usual. It's probably just a new strategy to see how long the individual entries stay up,
http://www.librarything.com/profile/hfjjtyun
ETA: I note that this one is posting more slowly than usual. It's probably just a new strategy to see how long the individual entries stay up,
193Taphophile13
another 550 bot starting
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198535#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/justzack4
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198535#
https://www.librarything.com/profile/justzack4
196Taphophile13
seems to translate as "travel massage"
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198551
https://www.librarything.com/profile/exgqggu9891
https://www.librarything.com/topic/198551
https://www.librarything.com/profile/exgqggu9891
199Lyndatrue
There really needs to be a test that says too many posts == spammer, and an automatic account lock... Or something.
200Taphophile13
>199 Lyndatrue:
Oh, yes. A 24 hour wait before posting, or something.
I also don't understand what they think they are accomplishing with so many duplicate ads, in Korean. How many LTers even read the language and how many are anywhere near the casinos they are advertising?
Oh, yes. A 24 hour wait before posting, or something.
I also don't understand what they think they are accomplishing with so many duplicate ads, in Korean. How many LTers even read the language and how many are anywhere near the casinos they are advertising?
205Taphophile13
It isn't even the weekend yet.
206MarthaJeanne
http://www.librarything.com/profile/soon95207
Surprised this one is still up, as the posts are beginning to disappear.
Surprised this one is still up, as the posts are beginning to disappear.
207CurrerBell
http://www.librarything.com/profile/soon95207
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198575 (with a whole slew of others; I just flagged this one and the account)
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198575 (with a whole slew of others; I just flagged this one and the account)
208CurrerBell
here's another of the same thing http://www.librarything.com/profile/nistansood123
example http://www.librarything.com/topic/198577#
example http://www.librarything.com/topic/198577#
225MarthaJeanne
But most of the time the links don't work AND we knock them out really quickly. Does it really do them any good?
227MarthaJeanne
>226 2wonderY: I think they hoped people wouldn't flag an archbishop.
228CurrerBell
>227 MarthaJeanne: Wouldn't flag an archbishop? Am I the only good Presbyterian around here?
229MarthaJeanne
http://www.librarything.com/topic/198778
Author spam. (Reference only http://www.librarything.com/profile/Brenda.Winters)
Author spam. (Reference only http://www.librarything.com/profile/Brenda.Winters)
230amanda4242
>299 Now she's adding spam pictures everywhere.
232Lyndatrue
aughggggg!!!!!! (bot, massive)
http://www.librarything.com/profile/key8752
ETA: Whoa. Thanks, invisible staff person. All gone. XXOO
http://www.librarything.com/profile/key8752
ETA: Whoa. Thanks, invisible staff person. All gone. XXOO
236amanda4242
attacking book talk https://www.librarything.com/profile/faithfuddlly3
240andyl
Another couple of 550Box spammers
This one still needs more flags https://www.librarything.com/profile/vfrxds87
This one still needs more flags https://www.librarything.com/profile/vfrxds87
241MarthaJeanne
Gone.
242andyl
Continued with https://www.librarything.com/profile/retghy51
243andyl
>242 andyl: Wow he didn't last long - only got one message in before the ban hammer came down.
256aeclark
>230 amanda4242: does anyone know how to change the group pictures back to what they were before? Eg the primary picture for the 75 Book group?
257Taphophile13
>256 aeclark: Can the group administrator or creator do it? Perhaps you could get in touch with that person or maybe staff can do it. Also, the book covers do seem to be more about advertising her own books rather than about the group itself. Would it be appropriate to flag as spam, thus reverting to the prior picture? I'm not a member of those groups but the pictures do seem intrusive.
259amanda4242
>256 aeclark: &>257 Taphophile13: I think those pictures are spam and would have flagged them as such, but I've never flagged a picture and didn't see any way to do so. Could someone please let me know how to do it so that wretched picture can disappear from my beloved 75 Books Challenge?
Tämä viestiketju jatkuu täällä: Spam reporting thread #43.