Tim Whitmarsh
Teoksen Battling the Gods: Atheism in the Ancient World tekijä
Tietoja tekijästä
Tim Whitmarsh is Reader in Greek Literature at the University of Exeter.
Tekijän teokset
Associated Works
Greeks on Greekness: Viewing the Greek Past Under the Roman Empire (2006) — Avustaja — 11 kappaletta
Athenaeus and his world : reading Greek culture in the Roman Empire (2000) — Avustaja — 8 kappaletta
Philostratus's Heroikos: Religion And Cultural Identity In The Third Century C. E. (2004) — Avustaja — 7 kappaletta
A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Blackwell Companions to the Ancient World) (2010) — Avustaja — 7 kappaletta
Being Greek under Rome: Cultural Identity, the Second Sophistic and the Development of Empire (2001) — Avustaja — 6 kappaletta
After the Crisis: Remembrance, Re-anchoring and Recovery in Ancient Greece and Rome (2020) — Avustaja — 3 kappaletta
Plotting With Eros: Essays on the Poetics of Love and the Erotics of Reading (2009) — Avustaja — 2 kappaletta
Intende, lector echoes of myth, religion and ritual in the ancient novel (2013) — Avustaja — 2 kappaletta
The Ancient Novel and Beyond (Mnemosyne, Bibliotheca Classica Batava Supplementum) (2003) — Avustaja — 2 kappaletta
Classical antiquity (vol 29 no 2) — Avustaja — 1 kappale
Emotions and Narrative in Ancient Literature and Beyond : Studies in Honour of Irene de Jong (2022) — Avustaja — 1 kappale
Merkitty avainsanalla
Yleistieto
- Kanoninen nimi
- Whitmarsh, Tim
- Sukupuoli
- male
- Kansalaisuus
- England
- Organisaatiot
- Cambridge University
Jäseniä
Kirja-arvosteluja
Listat
Palkinnot
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Tilastot
- Teokset
- 14
- Also by
- 30
- Jäseniä
- 497
- Suosituimmuussija
- #49,748
- Arvio (tähdet)
- 3.8
- Kirja-arvosteluja
- 12
- ISBN:t
- 53
- Kielet
- 2
There is an interesting discussion about the introduction of Diopeithe's decree in the 430's BC...Whitmarsh calls him a religious crackpot but his decree has massive and long lasting impact. Up until this decree the Athenians were pretty tolerant of varying beliefs about the gods. But following the decree ...to be a good citizen you not only had to do right but to think right too. In a way, this intolerance about "right-thinking" has echoed down through the ages with religious bigotry and intolerance and justified all sorts of terrible pogroms and religious wars....especially after the 300's AD when Christianity gained the ascendancy.
Atheists, after this decree, ran very real risks of being condemned for impiety and disbelief in the gods. and one hears the echoes of this intolerance with Galilio being shown the instruments of torture...to help change his beliefs; and Charles Darwin being reluctant to publish his findings for fear of offending his religious wife ....let alone the rest of the establishment of Victorian England.
There seem to be many in the ancient Greek world who not only didn't believe in the riotous goings-on at Mt Olympus but who rejected the concept of gods altogether. And I take my hat off to them. Diogenes, the cynic, who, whilst one man was marvelling at a series of temple inscriptions put up by survivors of sea storms, retorted that there would have been many more if the the non-survivors had also left dedications. Whitmarsh also makes the point that, as a rule, polytheism...the belief in many gods....was infinitely more hospitable to unbelievers than monotheism. Under Christianity, by contrast, there was no good way of being an atheist. Atheism was the categorical rejection of the very premise on which Christianity defined itself. (I think Augustine of Hippo bears a fair bit or responsibility for this intolerance which has continued don through the centuries ...and probably held back western civilisation from intellectual development for about a thousand years).
I would have liked to have seen more about atheism in other societies (for example, Egyptian, Persian, Chinese, Indian). But the author explains that although China for example had its atheists and other places also, the best historical writings and materials were available for Greece ....hence his concentration on this state. Rome is considered in the latter part of the book and, in general, was fairly tolerant of all sorts of religions and non-believers until the formal adoption of Christianity as the state religion...and with it....as mentioned above...came those wonderful attributes of intolerance, persecution, and execution for those who did not profess the "right-beliefs".
Generally, I found the book quite fascinating ..though also mildly depressing ...especially the persecution of non-believers that is a recurring theme. I give it four stars.… (lisätietoja)