Picture of author.
7+ teosta 924 jäsentä 10 arvostelua

Tietoja tekijästä

Natan Sharansky is currently the Chairman of the Adelson Institute for Strategic Studies in Jerusalem.
Image credit: Andrew Ratto

Tekijän teokset

Associated Works

Be A Mensch (2009) — Avustaja — 19 kappaletta

Merkitty avainsanalla

Yleistieto

Jäseniä

Kirja-arvosteluja

excellent read. from the time he was growing up in Russia to the 1967 was in Israel he hardly knew what it meant to be a Jew. "The fourth line on the passport has a J". He became a dissident, a refusing, went to prison, release and immigrated to Israel. Became a member of Knesset and then worked for the Jewish Agency. An amazing story about a strong and smart and courages person.
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
evatkaplan | Feb 20, 2022 |
I am not sure how or what to rate this book, since Sharansky was always, despite my not yet being Jewish, a hero to me for some reason. I feel like I only even heard of him after I finished college, yet I recall making dinner for a couple of former Soviet refusniks who'd gotten out of the Ukraine just after the explosion of Chernoble, in Kiev, yet this would have had to have been in 1985, and Chernoble was earlier. Nevertheless, in speaking with them, I felt honored to have a connection with people like Sharansky, who fought an oppressive regime and spoke out for those who could not speak.… (lisätietoja)
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
FourFreedoms | 2 muuta kirja-arvostelua | May 17, 2019 |
I am not sure how or what to rate this book, since Sharansky was always, despite my not yet being Jewish, a hero to me for some reason. I feel like I only even heard of him after I finished college, yet I recall making dinner for a couple of former Soviet refusniks who'd gotten out of the Ukraine just after the explosion of Chernoble, in Kiev, yet this would have had to have been in 1985, and Chernoble was earlier. Nevertheless, in speaking with them, I felt honored to have a connection with people like Sharansky, who fought an oppressive regime and spoke out for those who could not speak.… (lisätietoja)
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
ShiraDest | 2 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Mar 6, 2019 |
I finally got around to reading Natan Sharansky's The Case for Democracy: The Power of Freedom to

Overcome Tyranny and Terror (2006). Sharansky's argument is that freedom is good for everyone. The more freedom, the more security. Everyone will be happy and peaceful. Dictatorships are bad for their people, and threats to peace. It is an argument that President George W. Bush repeated during the invasion of Iraq.

Sharansky's struggle for freedom began as a dissident in the Soviet society of fear, where after years of agitation he was labeled a spy, and sent to the gulag. After Ronald Reagan personally mentioned Sharansky in a conversation with Mikhail Gorbachev, the dissident was fattened up, released, and allowed to immigrate to Israel. Sharansky entered politics in his adoptive land, and formed a party whose objective was to assimilate the massive influx of Soviet emigres into Israeli Society. The party was so successful, that it lost its purpose. A powerful figure in Israeli politics, Sharansky was active in the negotiations with Yasser Arafat throughout the 1990s. He believes that peace in the Middle East is elusive because of the dictators hold such tremendous power over their fearful and subjected people. These regimes are propped up with a false ideology ruthlessly supported by state organized media, and maintained by a brutal oppression of civil rights and free thought. Sharansky sees the same pattern in Syria or the Palestinian Authority as he saw in the old Soviet Union. These authoritarian regimes are abetted by the foreign policy realists in the West. As an example, he recounts a conversation he had with former president Jimmy Carter. In discussing his experience advocating peace in the Middle East, Carter stated he had a good partnership with Syrian dictator Hafez Assad because he felt that he could always trust the dictator to keep his word. To Sharansky, this line of thinking lacked moral clarity. Even if one could take a dictator's word to the bank, it still did not change the fact that they crushed human freedom and degraded the humanity of their peoples. The entire book is an argument for idealism in foreign policy and against realism or relativism.

Historians will find interesting insights on US-Soviet Detente (he opposed it), Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan (he speaks highly of the Gipper), his arrival in Israel (he was shocked by the division he found within a democratic society), and the Middle East peace negotiations in the 1990s (he wanted to couple concessions with guarantees of more open, transparent government). Future historians will undoubtedly look to this book to gain an insights into early year of the Global War on Terror.

From my blog: http://gregshistoryblog.blogspot.com/2014/06/recent-read-natan-sharansky-case-fo...
… (lisätietoja)
½
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
gregdehler | 3 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Aug 24, 2014 |

Palkinnot

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Tilastot

Teokset
7
Also by
1
Jäseniä
924
Suosituimmuussija
#27,777
Arvio (tähdet)
3.9
Kirja-arvosteluja
10
ISBN:t
39
Kielet
3

Taulukot ja kaaviot