Picture of author.

David Mamet

Teoksen Glengarry Glen Ross: A Play tekijä

207+ teosta 10,267 jäsentä 170 arvostelua 19 Favorited

Tietoja tekijästä

David Mamet, November 30, 1947 - David Mamet was born on November 30, 1947 in Flossmoor, Illinois. He attended Goddard College in Vermont and the Neighborhood Playhouse School of Theater in New York. He began his career as an actor and a director, but soon turned to playwriting. He won acclaim in näytä lisää 1976 with three Off-Broadway plays, "The Duck Variations," "Sexual Perversity in Chicago" and "American Buffalo." His work became known for it's strong male characters and the description of the decline of morality in the world. In 1984, Mamet received the Pulitzer Prize in Literature for his play, "Glengarry Glen Ross." In 1981, before he received the Pulitzer, Mamet tried his hand at screenwriting. he started by adapting "The Postman Always Rings Twice," and then adapting his own "Glengarry Glen Ross" as well as writing "The Untouchables" and Wag the Dog." He also taught at Goddard College, Yale Drama School and New York University. Mamet won the Jefferson Award in 1974, the Obie Award in 1976 and 1983, the New York Drama Critics Circle Award in 1977 and 1984, the Outer Circle Award in 1978, the Society of West End Theater Award in 1983, The Pulitzer Prize in 1984, The Dramatists Guild Hall-Warriner Award in 1984, and American Academy Award in 1986 and a Tony Award in 1987. He is considered to be one of the greatest artists in his field. (Bowker Author Biography) näytä vähemmän
Image credit: Brigitte Lacombe

Tekijän teokset

Glengarry Glen Ross: A Play (1984) 1,076 kappaletta
Oleanna (1992) 800 kappaletta
American Buffalo (1975) 513 kappaletta
On Directing Film (1991) 460 kappaletta
The Untouchables [1987 film] (1987) — Screenwriter — 355 kappaletta
Writing in Restaurants (1986) 310 kappaletta
Speed-the-Plow (1988) 298 kappaletta
Chicago: A Novel (2018) 204 kappaletta
The Old Religion (1997) 174 kappaletta
A Life in the Theatre (1977) 151 kappaletta
The Village: A Novel (1994) 150 kappaletta
Glengarry Glen Ross [1992 film] (1992) — Screenwriter — 147 kappaletta
The Cryptogram (1995) 147 kappaletta
Boston Marriage (2001) 124 kappaletta
House of Games [1987 film] (1987) 110 kappaletta
The Edge [Video Recording] (Director Unknown) (1997) — Screenwriter — 105 kappaletta
House of Games (1987) 100 kappaletta
Some Freaks (1989) 99 kappaletta
South of the Northeast Kingdom (2002) 98 kappaletta
Edmond (1982) 85 kappaletta
Romance (2005) 80 kappaletta
The Verdict [1982 film] (1982) — Screenwriter — 80 kappaletta
Heist [2001 film] (2001) — Director/Screenwriter — 70 kappaletta
Faustus (2004) 69 kappaletta
Jafsie and John Henry: Essays (1999) 67 kappaletta
The Old Neighborhood (1998) 65 kappaletta
Woods, Lakeboat, Edmond (1987) 64 kappaletta
November (2008) 62 kappaletta
Passover (1995) 59 kappaletta
Spartan (2004) — Director; Screenwriter — 57 kappaletta
Theatre (2010) 57 kappaletta
Race (2010) 54 kappaletta
Bar Mitzvah (1998) 52 kappaletta
The Postman Always Rings Twice [1981 film] (1981) — Screenwriter — 40 kappaletta
Reunion and Dark Pony (1979) 39 kappaletta
The Spanish Prisoner [film] (1998) 38 kappaletta
Hoffa [1992 film] (1992) — Screenwriter — 34 kappaletta
Plays 3 (1996) 33 kappaletta
Things Change (1989) 32 kappaletta
The Shield: The Complete Third Season (2008) — Ohjaaja — 32 kappaletta
The Shawl and Prairie du Chien (1985) 30 kappaletta
The Woods: A Drama (1979) 30 kappaletta
Short Plays and Monologues (1650) 28 kappaletta
Redbelt (2008) 28 kappaletta
The Unit: Season 3 (2014) 27 kappaletta
Theatre (1937) 26 kappaletta
Death Defying Acts (1996) 24 kappaletta
The Voysey Inheritance (2005) 24 kappaletta
Three War Stories (2013) 23 kappaletta
The Chinaman (1999) 23 kappaletta
The Anarchist (2013) 21 kappaletta
The Water Engine (1978) 21 kappaletta
Lakeboat (1980) 18 kappaletta
The Winslow Boy [1999 film] (1999) 18 kappaletta
Three children's plays (1986) 17 kappaletta
The Unit: Season 4 (2014) 17 kappaletta
Henrietta (1786) 15 kappaletta
Homicide: A Screenplay (1992) 15 kappaletta
The Duck and the Goat (1996) 14 kappaletta
Homicide [1991 film] (1991) — Ohjaaja — 14 kappaletta
The Hero Pony: Poems (1990) 13 kappaletta
David Mamet: Plays Four (2002) 13 kappaletta
China Doll (2015) 13 kappaletta
Orchards (1987) — Tekijä — 12 kappaletta
The Penitent (2017) 12 kappaletta
Keep Your Pantheon (2009) 12 kappaletta
The frog prince: A play (1983) 12 kappaletta
The Handle and the Hold (2013) 11 kappaletta
Oh, Hell!: Two One Act Plays (1991) 11 kappaletta
We're No Angels: A Screenplay (1994) 10 kappaletta
The Owl: A Story for Children (1987) 10 kappaletta
Edmond [2005 film] (2005) — Writer — 10 kappaletta
The Shawl (1985) 9 kappaletta
The Three Sisters 9 kappaletta
Warm and Cold (1988) 8 kappaletta
Squirrels: A Play (1982) 7 kappaletta
The Duck Variations (1988) 7 kappaletta
Three Jewish plays (1987) 6 kappaletta
Plays 5 (2015) 4 kappaletta
The Verdict: A Screenplay (1981) 4 kappaletta
Manifiesto (2011) 4 kappaletta
Yes But So What 4 kappaletta
Twelve Angry Men 3 kappaletta
Phil Spector 2 kappaletta
Teatteri (2013) 2 kappaletta
Oleanna [1994 film] (2003) — Ohjaaja — 2 kappaletta
Una profesión de putas (1996) 2 kappaletta
Shoeshine 2 kappaletta
Vermont 2 kappaletta
Two Conversations 2 kappaletta
Mr. Happiness 2 kappaletta
Two Scenes 2 kappaletta
Dowsing 2 kappaletta
Deer Dogs 2 kappaletta
In the Mall 2 kappaletta
Maple Sugaring 2 kappaletta
Morris and Joe 2 kappaletta
The Dog 2 kappaletta
Film Crew 2 kappaletta
Four A.M. 2 kappaletta
Food 2 kappaletta
The Power Outage 2 kappaletta
Columbus Avenue 2 kappaletta
Businessmen 2 kappaletta
In Old Vermont 2 kappaletta
A Sermon 2 kappaletta
Epilogue 2 kappaletta
Cold 2 kappaletta
Doctor 2 kappaletta
The Hat 2 kappaletta
Steve McQueen 2 kappaletta
Cross Patch 2 kappaletta
Monologue 1 kappale
Vrai et faux (2010) 1 kappale
Two Enthusiasts 1 kappale
Almost Done 1 kappale
The Luftmensch 1 kappale
Dark Pony 1 kappale
Reunion 1 kappale
Prairie du Chien 1 kappale
A Wasted Weekend 1 kappale
The Joke Code 1 kappale
Bradford 1 kappale
6 Action Movies [DVD] — Ohjaaja — 1 kappale
Secret Names 1 kappale
Sunday Afternoon 1 kappale
David Mamet shorts (2010) 1 kappale
On Acting (1999) 1 kappale
School (2010) 1 kappale
Jolly 1 kappale
L.A. Sketches 1 kappale
Dodge 1 kappale
Strays (2004) 1 kappale
Fish 1 kappale
TOPLU OYUNLARI 1 1 kappale

Associated Works

Kirsikkapuisto (1904) — Adapter, eräät painokset; Johdanto, eräät painokset1,602 kappaletta
Vanja-eno (1897) — Adapter, eräät painokset941 kappaletta
The Best American Nonrequired Reading 2004 (2004) — Avustaja — 744 kappaletta
Writers on Writing: Collected Essays from the New York Times (2001) — Avustaja — 446 kappaletta
A Practical Handbook for the Actor (1986) — Johdanto — 444 kappaletta
Ronin [1998 film] (1998) — Screenwriter — 254 kappaletta
Bad Trips (1991) — Avustaja — 233 kappaletta
The Best American Poetry 1999 (1999) — Avustaja — 208 kappaletta
Nine Plays of the Modern Theater (1981) — Avustaja — 184 kappaletta
Take Ten: New 10-Minute Plays (1997) — Avustaja — 169 kappaletta
Granta 55: Children (1996) — Avustaja — 130 kappaletta
Granta 16: Science (1985) — Avustaja — 82 kappaletta
Moving Parts: Monologues from Contemporary Plays (1992) — Avustaja — 60 kappaletta
The Jewish Writer (1998) — Avustaja — 53 kappaletta
The Best American Political Writing 2008 (2008) — Avustaja — 37 kappaletta
Vanya on 42nd Street [1994 film] (1995) — Original play — 31 kappaletta
The Obie Winners: The Best of Off-Broadway (1980) — Avustaja — 29 kappaletta
That's a Wrap: How Movies Are Made (1991) — Esipuhe — 26 kappaletta
American Buffalo [1996 film] (1996) — Tekijä — 24 kappaletta
Best American Plays: 8th Series, 1974-1982 (1983) — Avustaja — 19 kappaletta
We're No Angels [1989 film] (1989) — Screenwriter — 18 kappaletta
Best American Plays: Ninth Series, 1983-1992 (1993) — Avustaja — 16 kappaletta
Playboy Magazine ~ April 1990 (Deborah Driggs) (1990) — Avustaja — 2 kappaletta
Playboy Magazine | January 1989 | 35th Anniversary Issue (1989) — Avustaja — 2 kappaletta

Merkitty avainsanalla




The four stars are mostly for the language, at which Mamet excels. The conversations throughout the book may not accurately represent how most spoke in the 20's but they were rich and enjoyable.
I like the story throughout and it came with a satisfying ending.
Did this on audio and the narrator was well matched to the material.
Merkitty asiattomaksi
jldarden | 11 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Feb 5, 2024 |
The purpose of theater, like magic, like religion . . . is to inspire cleansing awe. What makes good drama? And why does drama matter in an age that is awash in information and entertainment? David Mamet, one of our greatest living playwrights, tackles these questions with bracing directness and aphoristic authority. He believes that the tendency to dramatize is essential to human nature, that we create drama out of everything from today’s weather to next year’s elections. But the highest expression of this drive remains the theater.
With a cultural range that encompasses Shakespeare, Bretcht, and Ibsen, Death of a Salesman and Bad Day at Black Rock, Mamet shows us how to distinguish true drama from its false variants. He considers the impossibly difficult progression between one act and the next and the mysterious function of the soliloquy. The result, in Three Uses of the Knife, is an electrifying treatise on the playwright’s art that is also a strikingly original work of moral and aesthetic philosophy.
… (lisätietoja)
Merkitty asiattomaksi
wpcalibrary | 5 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jan 26, 2024 |
This is the first David Mamet novel that I've read. Chicago tells a 1920s story about gun-running, the Italian South-side Outfit, the Irish North-siders, a flower-shop girl, a black madame, a singer passing in the speaks, and two Chicago Tribune reporters still dealing with the Great War while happily avoiding the Volstead Act's intended consequences.

The main issue here is that we are more than 100 pages in until the actual plot of the novel begins to truly unfold. Neither the characters nor the dialogue are enough to really compel the reader forward to that point--unless one is just interested in the scene. As a person who loves history and Chicago the city, I had no major issues doing that, but I imagine others could be annoyed.

Also, this is neither a thriller nor a true mystery (the solution isn't strictly possible until the end, when the protagonist knows and the narration simply reveals it as a fait accompli). As such, it's hard to figure the genre of this novel and that may be disappointing some of the readers who came expecting X and ended up with Y.

But, if you like 1920s Chicago, David Mamet style conversations, and a wide cast of Chicago's demi-monde, then you will enjoy (though probably not overly so) this book.
… (lisätietoja)
Merkitty asiattomaksi
JohnLocke84 | 11 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Oct 12, 2023 |
First off, reading this book is like reading someone's private journal; the thoughts are broken up, there are incongruous jumps between what are laid out as sections of the same chapter; ideas are just thrown out with minimal or no argument or development. Not what one is looking for in an argumentative or persuasive book. On the other hand, if you want to get a peek inside Mamet's head, this is for you.

Okay, now on to the review of the content.

He comes right out and identifies himself in the first three pages: a Liberal who, in late mid-life, discovered that life is made of trade-offs and therefore became a conservative. Immediately, for me, the alarms are going off: here is a guy who claims that only in his 50's or 60's did it occurred to him that, “surprise!” life is made of trade-offs and we can't have everything; by extension, we're left to believe that as a “Liberal” he must have believed was that there were no trade-offs and we could indeed have everything.

Next follow a slew of “musings with titles” that we are to take, apparently, as chapters or essays. He fills this with many curious assertions that will sound familiar if you've listened to Fox or Limbaugh.
1. “Liberals hate capitalism.” Full stop.
2. A running screed, spread across a few of his titled musings, that can be summed up as, “Young Liberals suck. Liberal Arts degrees suck. FILM SCHOOLS SUCK.” (He really, really, really does not like film schools.)
3. In particular, “Young Liberals” (he capitalizes that repeatedly) have been, and are now, ruining our country because they hate (economic) freedom, America (-ness..?), and Israel. He softens this here and there by downgrading, “hate freedom,” to something along the lines of, “liberals want the same things conservatives want, but are just hopelessly confused about how to get them.”

Who precisely are these people he hates/pities/dismisses? Apparently they are uneducated and lazy, naïve and clueless, busy doing their yoga, getting their houses feng shui'd, and standing around watching their immigrant gardeners sweat under the Sun while moaning about how it is so unfair they don't get paid more, while faithfully recycling their cans and bottles in a desperate attempt to fill the void left by their rejection of responsibility/authority/God. This is not hyperbole (on my part). Mamet actually writes this.

Do these people even exist? What “Young” person owns a house, complete with gardeners and interior decorators, while going to school and being unemployed and, presumable, otherwise living a life of dissipation? Perhaps in David Mamet's world, this is a reality; but in that case he is not impugning liberalism or Liberalism, but some Mamet construction that simply shares the name Liberalism. Perhaps in the circles he runs in, this is happening (*cough* *cough* looking at the Mamet kids and their friends.) But not anywhere I've been.

In any case, these 20 and 30-somethings have been exerting their terrible power by... actually, that is also not clear. They way he describes them they would seem to unable to even feed themselves. But, as it would seem he has particularly singled out people that have become adults only in the last decade or, at the most two decades, one must assume they not only overcame their obvious disabilities, but also have access to a time machine... or that these people formed a cabal while still in diapers... or something. It's almost like Mamet is blaming today's “Young Liberals” as a way of not blaming... I dunno, just to make up some random numbers, people who at this point, roughly 50, 60, 70?

Moving on a bit, we also find out that liberals are all God hating, but Nature loving because Nature is the new God; as is, confusingly, Government, Equality, and -yet more confusingly- Liberalism itself. Unless Liberalism is just a new religion. I forget. At times his paragraphs are koan-like... or simply nonsense.

Next, we move on to finding out that Mamet hates bureaucracies. A lot. (When Mamet doesn't like something, he really goes all in.) Government, management, labor (presumably organized labor?), safety inspectors, and I'm sure more that I am forgetting; in any case, all of them are leeches, all only existing to perpetuate their own existence. I'm not sure who, in broad strokes, this leaves, but apparently engineers (but only good ones), writers (of course) and set designers are okay. Again, I'm not making this up, that's his list. Also, students who are NOT LIBERAL ARTS MAJORS maybe get a pass.

I suspect he really means to give a pass to some “Rand-ian” class of creators. And he really does seem to mean this in a Randian way; the innovator, the creator, the unfettered striver is the pinnacle of human development, etc.. Of course, he several times tells us that, yes, we need government for roads, police, military, and a handful of other activities; presumably these people would not belong to any bureaucracy, and the above mentioned strivers would not either.

In other words, we will all exist as small, autonomous teams and individuals. Roads, military, police and a few other functions are still to be provided by the (nonexistent) (non-bureaucratic) government (run on, as we later find out many pages later, a 0% tax rate: since lower taxes raise earnings, and higher earnings raise tax revenues, having no taxes at all will generate the most tax rev... wait... hrmm. Oh, wait, nevermind. My 3rd grade arithmetic was bothering me, but I'm all better now.) Unfettered growth and prosperity will be provided by entrepreneurs; in teams of 4 or less, of course, since management and labor are THE HATED BUREAUCRACY.

And of course, it goes without saying, no one will have heard of David Mamet because *?*$ {@&*! LIBERAL ART MAJORS.

Sigh. I wish I was making this up (well, the last bit I did.)

To recapitulate, since I'm letting loose with a bit of stream-of-consciousness myself:
1. Mamet only just now discovered that life is trade-offs and this SHOCK! has shown him the error of his “liberal” ways.
2. Needless to say, having defined Liberalism to be the kind of doe-eyed naivete that would embarrass a Care Bear, Mamet finds tearing it apart is fairly easy.
3. Then, foisting this belief onto others, Mamet invents from whole cloth an entire generation whiling away their time in film school making art pornos, with barely enough time left to split between complaining to their interior decorators, eating ice-cream, and spitting on the grave of Jefferson while writing checks to Hezbollah (presumably from their trust funds.)
4. One wonders, given this, why anyone under the age of 45 is complaining at all, what with the feng shui and peeled grapes and all: David Mamet doesn't deign to address this.
5. Clearly, David Mamet needs to get out more.

Mamet is really angry at the 1960's and 70's, the excesses and absurdities of some strains of Liberalism of these decades. Mamet is angry at the Roosevelts and Taft (and maybe Freud.) And he is angry at film school, and, at this point is so angry he is making the Hulk jealous. David Mamet wants the kids to get off the goddamned lawn.

That said, I am a bit sad: he does broach, in moments of clarity, some issues that deserve to be discussed. Some larger issues like, “What exactly is meant by Equality? How much is enough? How do we know when we've gotten there, and what do we measure in order to know that we've gotten there?” These, and questions like these, are real, difficult, and worthy of serious consideration; and I don't think they are often approached by people of a more leftist leaning; there is a presumption that “equality” is worth whatever it takes, whatever that might mean, and whatever exactly equality means. I think that is a fair point.

But those questions are all buried in a angry prose of a guy who -again- only just now figured out that life is made of trade-offs. This is from a guy who lauds plumbers and farmers, but who apparently doesn't get out enough to realize that there might be more to Liberals than his daughter's “heiress” classmates and his friends' “doyen” dinner circles, and that there might be more to the “Liberal Young” than evidenced by the 40 or going-on-50 year old snapshot he has in his head.

This from guy who hates social studies because it is indoctrination, which the schools should not be doing, because culture can only be learned in the family, because only in the family can we learn morals, moral reasoning, and the application of justice... which you have no right to apply in law because games would suck without rules, which is why if you cheat in business maybe you can get a pass, but you should be ostracize anyone who would cheat in a game of poker. Oh, and despite all those platitudes, families are really truly valuable because of their economic impact. Which is why you can't have gay marriage. (Is your head spinning yet?)

The amount of illogic deployed in this book is, literally, dizzying.

Ignoring all that, the book, for me can be paraphrased, emotionally at least, in one passage: Mamet is enjoying a visit to an art gallery and is Disgusted! Angered! Revolted! to see a lady not throw out her paper plate, but instead fold it up and put it in her purse, presumably to reuse. Obviously, he concludes, she is a Liberal desperately placating her untenable nihilism. (Again, that is not sarcasm on my part; this is paraphrasing what Mamet writes.)

Think about this. Run through this yourself. Really ponder what kind of person (a) even notices someone else doing something like this, (b) has any kind of emotional reaction whatsoever to it, much less a reaction of being disgusted and angered, (c) concludes that this is yet more proof of the vast conspiracy against righteousness, and (d) writes about it in a book and publishes it.

That's who wrote this book, and that's what, God help me, I just spent a part of my life reading.
… (lisätietoja)
Merkitty asiattomaksi
dcunning11235 | 10 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Aug 12, 2023 |



You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Terence Rattigan Author, Original play
Dean White Director
Jonathan Katz Screenwriter
Clark Johnson Director
Bill Norton Director
John Guare Author
Gregor Jordan Director
Martin Jarvis Director
Joe Mantegna Actor, Narrator
Jack Nicholson Cast, Actor
Juan Ruiz Anchía Cinematographer
Barry Reed Original novel
Marcel Otten Translator
John Getz Narrator
Josh Stamberg Narrator
Gordon Clapp Narrator
Zdravko Duša Translator
Julek Neumann Translator
Yōko Sakai Translator
Pierre Laville Translator
Kristina Åberg Translator
Bernd Samland Translator
Ali H. Neyzi Translator
Masolino D'Amico Translator
Ramon Villanova Translator
John Houseman Foreword


Also by
Arvio (tähdet)
½ 3.6
Kuinka monen suosikki

Taulukot ja kaaviot