Philip T. Hoffman
Teoksen Why Did Europe Conquer the World? tekijä
Tietoja tekijästä
Philip T. Hoffman is professor of business economics and professor of history at the California Institute of Technology.
Tekijän teokset
Surviving Large Losses: Financial Crises, the Middle Class, and the Development of Capital Markets (2007) 15 kappaletta
Dark Matter Credit: The Development of Peer-to-Peer Lending and Banking in France (2019) 9 kappaletta
Church and Community in the Diocese of Lyon, 1500-1789 (Yale Historical Publications Series) (1984) 7 kappaletta
¿Por Que Europa Conquisto el Mundo? 1 kappale
Merkitty avainsanalla
Yleistieto
There is no Common Knowledge data for this author yet. You can help.
Jäseniä
Kirja-arvosteluja
Listat
Palkinnot
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Tilastot
- Teokset
- 10
- Jäseniä
- 163
- Suosituimmuussija
- #129,735
- Arvio (tähdet)
- 3.7
- Kirja-arvosteluja
- 2
- ISBN:t
- 23
- Kielet
- 4
Why? Gunpowder Technology mostly. Why didn't other civilizations make use of it? Well, this is because many of them were involved in conflicts with steppe nomads. And some others were fighting mostly with and against cavalry. In the beginning gunpowder technologies were useless or minimally effective in both these cases. Guns simply had not yet advanced to the point of being decisively useful in these types of battles.
The Europeans, on the other hand, for the most part fought only against each other, with battle formations and tactics such that improvements in their gunpowder technologies paid big dividends. And so they spent time and treasure improving it. This constant warfare internal to Europe forced the combatants to improve battlefield tactics, global strategies, technologies, and everything that had to do with waging war. (Our author refers to this constant warfare as the 'Tournament'.)
There was also a concurrent improvement in sailing technology in Western Europe. Later, as cannons came into common use on ships, gunpowder technology paid very big dividends here too.
On top of that, European governments were more efficient in collecting taxes than the Eurasian powers when measured on a per capita basis. We all know that if you can't fund your war, you will soon find you can't fight it either. Thus, improvements made in gunpowder technology, sailing technology, and increasing (or at least steady and predictable) monetary resources available for military technology and actual warfare (gold and silver from the Americas of course added to this) made European dominance inevitable.
This was a very scholarly discussion. It is not intended to be a thrilling read. And it is not. But it is very thought-provoking nonetheless. Many readers, I expect, will find the mathematical model (mostly buried in the appendices) indecipherable and boring.… (lisätietoja)