J. Storrs Hall

Started off great, but it meanders aggressively and was unable to maintain the author's or my attention. His claim is that the technology exists for flying cars today, but the political wherewithal for them hasn't kept up. Regulations and environmentalism have gotten in the way. This corresponds well to my priors, but he downplays environmentalism more than I think is deserved; when I dug into his citations they were of poor quality, which unfortunately makes me shift away from the bit of his premise that I agree with. 2/5 due to abandonment.… (lisätietoja)

This reviewer's first contact with robotic A.I. was Hans Moravec's "Mind Children" which I read in the late 1980's and which persuaded me that real A.I. was possible. Another influence was John McCrone's "Going Inside" dealing with human thought processes that seem to be reproducible at a machine level (although he didn't suggested it).

Storrs Hall in this excellent book shows how A.I. researchers lost the thread in the following decades with a fixation on coding everything and building systems that worked fine in closed environments with fixed rules (e.g. chess games) but hopelessly in unpredictable real life situations.

He concludes that robots need to learn and adapt to their environments (be autogenous) although they may have some hard wired basic abilities upon which they can develop a "self" against which to make environmental tests (i.e. increase the capability/ adaption of their "self"). Another interesting aspect of the book is his discussion from chapter 18 onwards of robotic/ A.I. ethics as applicable to this new "self" and he opts for the Boy Scout Law: "One should be trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean and reverent", and he sees the task as, "... building a machine that understands what these qualities mean and what can we do to ensure that the machines that are built will have them."

Perhaps the author could have explored at greater length the concept of a robotic/ A.I. "self " to answer this question.

For example he says that A.I. would be rid of many human pressures like sexual jealousy, but if robotic A.I.'s adapt to different environments they will likely have differing abilities and "selves" that will differ in ability and capacity to protect the "self" (i.e. they may well be jealous and competitive if they are required to survive and adapt). Equally differing robotic "selves" may coöperate to gain a group advantage (e.g. a robotic Apollo, Aphrodite and Hephaestus or maybe the whole lot of them contributing their differing abilities).

His comparative advantage in human / robotic A.I. trade is not very convincing. We don't do a lot of trade with the great apes and we in turn may be even more distant from future autogenous A.I.'s.

Also he says that humans will have an "open source guarantee" with regard to robot/ A.I. code (i.e. they will have access to and will be able to delete undesirable variants) but this assumes 1) that they understand it and 2) that a robotic/ A.I. "self " will allow access (human or otherwise) to its code . It has invested a good deal in the evolution a viable "self" which could be put at risk with such a procedure.

Nevertheless it's a really good book, with Storrs Hall favouring good environments for autonomous learning machines and quoting the Christian Golden Rule, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" which seems like a good place to start with early autogenous evolving A.I.s.… (lisätietoja)