Gary R. Habermas
Teoksen The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus tekijä
Tietoja tekijästä
Gary R. Habermas (PhD, Michigan State University) is Distinguished Research Professor and chair of the department of philosophy at Liberty University. He is a foremost apologist on the historicity of Jesus' resurrection and has authored and coauthored over thirty books, including The Historical näytä lisää Jesus and The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (with Michael R. Licona). näytä vähemmän
Image credit: www.garyhabermas.com/promotional.htm
Tekijän teokset
Ancient Evidence for the Life of Jesus: Historical Records of His Death and Resurrection (The Verdict of History:… (1984) 94 kappaletta
Did the Resurrection Happen?: A Conversation with Gary Habermas and Antony Flew (Veritas Forum Books) (2009) 73 kappaletta
Memories of Jesus: A Critical Appraisal of James D. G. Dunn's Jesus Remembered (2010) — Toimittaja; Avustaja — 20 kappaletta
Why Is God Ignoring Me?: What to Do When It Feels Like He's Giving You the Silent Treatment (2010) 19 kappaletta
The Secret of the Talpiot Tomb: Unraveling the Mystery of the Jesus Family Tomb (2008) 15 kappaletta
The Resurrection-Vol. 1 2 kappaletta
The Resurrection-Vol. 2 2 kappaletta
Beyond Death 1 kappale
Resurrection for skeptics 1 kappale
Associated Works
The Case for Christ: A Journalist's Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus (1998) — Avustaja, eräät painokset — 9,151 kappaletta
To Everyone an Answer: A Case for the Christian Worldview: Essays in Honor of Norman L. Geisler (2004) — Avustaja — 355 kappaletta
Evidence for God: 50 Arguments for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science (2010) — Avustaja — 194 kappaletta
Merkitty avainsanalla
Yleistieto
- Virallinen nimi
- Habermas, Gary Robert
- Syntymäaika
- 1950
- Sukupuoli
- male
- Kansalaisuus
- USA
Jäseniä
Kirja-arvosteluja
Listat
You May Also Like
Associated Authors
Tilastot
- Teokset
- 34
- Also by
- 4
- Jäseniä
- 1,665
- Suosituimmuussija
- #15,419
- Arvio (tähdet)
- 3.9
- Kirja-arvosteluja
- 5
- ISBN:t
- 48
For Christians, Easter is actually the most important holiday of the year. It is the day we celebrate the resurrection of Jesus, which the apostle Paul argues is the one historical reality on which Christianity stands or falls. In other words, Christianity is falsifiable if the resurrection is disproved, or at least suspect if a credible case cannot be put forward that such an incredible event took place.
This book, edited by David Baggett explores that case and the counter-claims that might be put forward with a section in the middle exploring the journey of one of the participants, Antony Flew from atheism to a deistic form of theism. Baggett introduces the book narrating the history of the growing friendship between Habermas and Flew and the history of debates between the two over a nearly twenty year period, culminating with the debate at Cal Poly at San Luis Obispo in 2003.
Part One then is a transcript of that debate, including audience questions. Habermas begins by asserting a list of twelve known historical facts for which he would contend that the resurrection of Jesus is the best explanation. These are:
1. Jesus died by crucifixion.
2. He was buried.
3. The death of Jesus caused the disciples to despair and lose hope, believing that his life was ended.
4. Although not as widely accepted, many scholars hold that the tomb in which Jesus was buried was discovered to be empty just a few days later.
5. The disciples had experiences they believed were the literal appearances of the risen Christ.
6. The disciples were transformed from doubters who were afraid to identify themselves with Jesus to bold proclaimers of his death and resurrection.
7. This message was the center of preaching in the early church.
8. This message was especially proclaimed in Jerusalem, where Jesus was died and was buried shortly before.
9. As a result of this teaching, the church was born and grew.
10. Sunday became the primary day of worship.
11. James, who had been a skeptic, was converted to the faith when he also believed that he had seen the resurrected Jesus.
12. A few years later, Paul was converted by an experience that he likewise believed to be an appearance of the risen Christ.
Flew, who at one time was the foremost proponent of atheism, and still an avowed atheist at the point of this debate then engages these facts and the inferences from them. He questions the death, burial and most importantly the belief of the disciples that they had seen literal appearances of Jesus. Habermas invokes medical research on the physical effects of crucifixion on the body that can lead to swift death by asphyxia, the multiple testimonies to the burial of Jesus without contrary testimony and the witnesses to the empty tomb including the improbable citing of women as the first witnesses. Then he shows the improbability of mass hallucination, which anything other than hoax or literal appearance would require. It is striking that, at the end, Flew acknowledges that there are good rational grounds for the belief in the resurrection, although for him it remained incredible given his beliefs about the world.
Part Two begins with a conversation between Habermas and Flew about his journey from atheism to a deistic form of theism. The conversation was striking to me for two things. One was the intellectual engagement between these two men who had become friends. The other was the importance of design and fine-tuning arguments in persuading Flew to embrace deism. The second part of this section is Gary Habermas review of Flew's book, There Is a God. Perhaps most fascinating is the distinction of Flew's that Habermas notes between philosophical and scientific evidence. Plainly, scientific evidence figured more highly for Flew. It was also significant that a major barrier to embracing Christian theism for Flew was the problem of evil and suffering. Habermas contends that a free will defense may answer this but Flew believed this required a prior belief in revelation, a point of contention between the two. [It should be noted that Antony Flew died April 8, 2010, still embracing a deistic stance.]
The last part of the book returns to evidences and challenges to these evidences including ten philosophical concerns not addressed directly in the debate. The very end of this section and the appendix deals with the use of Bayes Theory of probability. I found this most interesting as it has been invoked in a number of discussions with atheists, usually by atheists, arguing that the probabilities of God's existence, or the resurrection fail to reach a threshold where belief is warranted. I will admit to not fully understanding the mathematics behind this argument, but found that the author confirmed my suspicion of the arbitrary character of assigning probabilities, which often reflect a priori beliefs rather than evidence per se'. I think more work needs to be done in answering this line of objection, which on the face of it sounds persuasive because of its quantitative nature.
As I noted at the beginning, the resurrection is essentially the lynch pin of Christian faith. For the person struggling with doubts or considering the credibility of the resurrection claim, this is an excellent first book, because it reflects a real conversation between two people with opposing views. We see the intellectual honesty of Antony Flew, who had the courage to change his beliefs when that was where the evidence took him. In the public and private conversations between Habermas and Flew we are given a model of dialogue and inquiry that is substantive, charitable, and intellectually honest in a public square nearly bereft of such conversations.… (lisätietoja)