Picture of author.

Mark Z. Danielewski

Teoksen House of Leaves tekijä

15 teosta 20,634 jäsentä 488 arvostelua 102 Favorited

Tietoja tekijästä

Mark Z. Danielewski is the author of House of Leaves, The Whalestoe Letters, Only Revolutions, The Fifty Year Sword, and The Familiar. (Bowker Author Biography)
Image credit: Photo (c) Marion Ettlinger


Tekijän teokset

House of Leaves (2000) 15,791 kappaletta, 377 arvostelua
Only Revolutions: A Novel (2006) 2,107 kappaletta, 34 arvostelua
The Familiar, Volume 1: One Rainy Day in May (2015) 754 kappaletta, 19 arvostelua
The Fifty Year Sword (2005) 653 kappaletta, 28 arvostelua
The Whalestoe Letters (2000) — Tekijä — 490 kappaletta, 9 arvostelua
The Familiar, Volume 2: Into the Forest (2015) 305 kappaletta, 5 arvostelua
The Familiar, Volume 3: Honeysuckle & Pain (2016) 210 kappaletta, 5 arvostelua
The Familiar, Volume 4: Hades (2017) 154 kappaletta, 3 arvostelua
The Familiar, Volume 5: Redwood (2017) 115 kappaletta, 5 arvostelua
The Little Blue Kite (2019) 47 kappaletta, 3 arvostelua
House of Leaves Pilot — Tekijä — 1 kappale
Clip 4 1 kappale
Yapraklar Evi (2018) 1 kappale

Merkitty avainsanalla


Kanoninen nimi
Danielewski, Mark Z.
New York, New York, USA
New York, New York, VS
Los Angeles, Californië, VS
Yale University (English Literature)
University of South Carolina (School of Cinema-Television)
Danielewski, Tad (father)
Poe (sister)
Lyhyt elämäkerta
Mark Z. Danielewski werd geboren in 1966. Het kaartenhuis is zijn debuut.



House of leaves Mark Z. Danielewski, Thing(amabrarian)s That Go Bump in the Night (tammikuu 2009)
House of Leaves, Someone explain it to me... (maaliskuu 2008)


Writing: 4
Characters: 4
Plot: 4
Setting: 5
Enjoyment: 4

House of Leaves combines multiple perspectives, primarily telling the stories of Navidson and Johnny. Navidson is a filmmaker who moves into a new house with his family only to find that the rules of the universe we all take for granted may not be so concrete within those walls. House of Leaves contains a manuscript that describes the films documenting their experiences within the house (as well as an irrational amount of "commentary" from experts after viewing the films). However, it also contains entries from Johnny, who finds the manuscript and seemingly reacts adversely to reading it.

It was genuinely really difficult to decide how I wanted to rate this book. While reading the sections about the Navidson family/house and some of Johnny's entries, I was extremely impressed by the writing. Mark Danielewski masters the projection of discomfort and foreboding onto the reader as opposed to relying on classic fear. The slow start really allowed for an unsettling feeling about the house by the time the first changes appeared. I found myself pausing and wondering, "Why am I so afraid of a door? Nothing substantial has happened yet." But in reality, sudden and unexplained changes to a home like that ARE substantial and difficult to wrap your mind around. The writing just allowed me to feel that reality. Similarly, the passages in which Johnny is clearly descending into psychosis are masterfully written. Word associations make it feel like the sentences should make sense, but they don't, which places a sense of confusion onto the reader that matches Johnny's.

The story itself was rather beautiful, especially the ending. ***spoiler*** Acceptance of one another and their impossible circumstances is what ultimately led to the recovery of the Navidson family. They didn't recover in a way that erased their past. Instead, they each hold their own scars from both the house and their lives prior, including the memories of those they lost along the way. ***end of spoiler***

However, I did find parts of this book rather slow, which made it difficult to pick it back up again after breaks (especially Johnny's repeated sexual exploits). While I enjoyed the concept of fake citations in the footnotes at first, trying to read through them slowed down the story and broke immersion a lot. I also felt like, while the format of the book is very creative, it was needless at times. It began to feel like some of the strange spacing was put there just to be different, and codes were added just for the sake of more codes without adding any meaning.
… (lisätietoja)
Merkitty asiattomaksi
rosearia | 376 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jul 18, 2024 |
Merkitty asiattomaksi
enoikosges | 376 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jul 16, 2024 |
The fact that this bullshit attempt at originality was ever published is the reason our world is fucked.
Merkitty asiattomaksi
capincus | 376 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jul 13, 2024 |

What to say...

Friends in my spec-fic book club have been talking about House of Leaves off and on for a while. I took one look and said, "not for me, babe." A few weeks later I was having drinks with some folks and one asked something to the effect of, "do you like ergodic literature?" After ensuring they hadn't said, "erotic literature," I replied, what the hell is ergodic literature?"

A while after that, I was in my neighborhood bookshop looking for a copy of something I can't remember. I was in a money-spending mood and saw House of Leaves poking out of the shelf, one copy, already a little removed. Is this for me?

I opened it up and thumbed through. One of the first pages proclaims, "This is not for you." Well, we can't have that, can we? But $30 for an odd book that I might hate? I was in the right mood for it.

I did a lot of chuckling as I read, because it started to teach me a lot about how I read and interact with books. A bit in, I caught myself writing a note, asking a question in the margin. I thought about that. Here I am, asking a question in the margin (asking who?) of a fiction novel that is essentially about an academic write-up of a movie that may or may not exist, about a house that may or may not exist, that may or may not (but definitely isn't) be cousin to The Doctor's TARDIS. Oh, and there are footnotes by not one, not two, but three different sources and connections to not one but two appendices.

It's just clever! I enjoyed engaging with the story. Decoding messages in an appendix after reading 50 pages of someone's descent into mania and psychosis - why not? But decoding a second message in the same place? That practice making everything else suspect (do the dropcaps mean anything? Does the translation say what the editors, what JT, says???).

All very, very, fun for me. I loved the constant in and out of the multiple stories, the intentional immersion breaking, the mystery. Nothing is true, but everything is true. Who can you trust? It's a work of fiction, what's it matter? Why are you flipping back to a piece of paper that's in a collage to identify a symbol, what are you some kinda nerd?

I had a really, really, good time reading this. I may have looked a nut rotating it and taking pictures and flipping them so I could read other parts, but it just tickled my fancy. I'll let other, smarter, folks talk about what it all means. I just had a good time.
… (lisätietoja)
Merkitty asiattomaksi
ThomasEB | 376 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jul 4, 2024 |


Romans (1)
2010s (4)


You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Christa Schuenke Translator
Martine Vosmaer Translator
Eric Fuentecilla Cover designer


Arvio (tähdet)
Kuinka monen suosikki

Taulukot ja kaaviot