Picture of author.
11+ teosta 620 jäsentä 18 arvostelua 1 Favorited

Tietoja tekijästä

James Chace is the Paul W. Williams Professor of Government and Public Law at Bard College. The former managing editor of Foreign Affairs and editor of World Policy Journal, he is the author of eight previous books

Sisältää nimen: James Chace

Image credit: Photograph by Enrico Ferorelli

Tekijän teokset

Associated Works

Entäs jos... : vaihtoehtoinen maailmanhistoria (2001) — Avustaja — 1,029 kappaletta
MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History — Autumn 1992 (1992) — Co-Author "The United States, the U.N., and Korea" — 16 kappaletta
MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History — Spring 1998 (1998) — Author "Bismark's Empire: Stillborn" — 15 kappaletta
MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History — Spring 1997 (1997) — Author "The Day the Cold War Started" — 13 kappaletta

Merkitty avainsanalla

Yleistieto

Kanoninen nimi
Chace, James
Virallinen nimi
Chace, James Clarke
Syntymäaika
1931-10-16
Kuolinaika
2004-10-08
Sukupuoli
male
Kansalaisuus
USA
Syntymäpaikka
Fall River, Massachusetts
Kuolinpaikka
Paris, France
Asuinpaikat
New York, New York, USA
Koulutus
Harvard University
Ammatit
historian
Suhteet
Valentine, Jean (spouse)

Jäseniä

Kirja-arvosteluja

The presidential election of 1912 was unique in American history, with four popular and viable candidates for office. The candidates were former president Theodore Roosevelt; sitting president William Taft; eventual winner and future president, Woodrow Wilson; and Eugene Debs, who earned the highest percentage of the electorate of any Socialist Party candidate.

When the election was over Wilson took the presidency. He became the only Democrat to serve as president between 1892 and 1932.

The Republicans, after owning the presidency for the past twenty years, were divided. Roosevelt, known to all as TR, had made his mark as president with a progressive agenda. He was disappointed that his hand-picked successor Taft had let the conservative Republican Congress run things. Roosevelt felt he could not in good conscience support Taft for a second term and threw his own hat in the ring.

When Taft outmaneuvered TR for the nomination at the Republican convention Roosevelt struck out on his own and formed the Progressive Party. With TR as it's presidential candidate, it became better known as the Bull Moose party.

Eugene Debs meanwhile, was the perennial candidate for the Socialist Party. But he was also a well respected labor leader and political activist. His candidacy rose in the wave of popularity for the progressive ideas he had long championed. Unfortunately for him, Roosevelt and Wilson took many of his ideas and incorporated them into their own platforms.

In 1912 author James Chace spends as much time on the biographies of the four candidates as he does on the presidential race. Thus, with five story threads to cover in less than 300 pages the book is more atmospheric than it is thorough. He succeeds mostly in giving a good sense of who the four candidates were.

Wilson and Roosevelt play the lead roles in the book. Wilson rose from the presidency of Princeton to the presidency of the United States. Much of his success came when he turned on the political bosses who had supported his run for the governorship of New Jersey. That turn solidified Wilson’s progressive credentials, so important to the 1912 campaign. Still, it took 46 rounds of voting for him to win the nomination at the Democratic convention.

Wilson depended on a “Southern strategy” to get and keep the White House. As a southerner himself he believed in the separation of the races. African Americans saw him as a white supremacist, and he showed them to be right by bringing Jim Crow rules into Federal jobs. He was not particularly fond of immigrants from Eastern Europe either. That issue caused him problems during the 1912 campaign, when he was forced to disown some of his documented statements on immigration.

TR had been unable to see Taft’s presidency as anything other than a poor reflection on him and a threat to his legacy. This blinded him to the potential for working with Taft to put himself back into the Republican nominee role. Instead TR antagonised the President, and forced Taft to run against him for the nomination.

Taft, you see, had never wanted to be president to begin with, being pushed into it by Roosevelt and his ambitious wife. After he lost the presidency in 1912 he finally got his wish to serve as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He was nominated to the post by President Harding in 1921. Taft is the only person to have ever been President and Chief Justice.

It is Debs who comes off as the most “modern” of the four. It's his progressive agenda that finally flourished under FDR during the Great Depression. Sadly, Debs didn’t live to see it.

The first decades of the twentieth century in America are a fascinating time. So much change was in the air. 1912 works best as a summary of the four men and their presidential race. It doesn’t go far beyond the summary level to put the race into the context of those times. If you are interested in the timeframe, or in presidential politics, it is a good starting point, but for me it’s a Two Star ⭐⭐ read.
… (lisätietoja)
1 ääni
Merkitty asiattomaksi
stevesbookstuff | 12 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Dec 28, 2021 |
An unfortunately poorly written book about a fascinating cast of characters: Woodrow Wilson, Teddy Roosevelt, Eugene Debs, and William Howard Taft. The writing is labored, the political issues are poorly explained, and few of the interesting stories are exploited, e.g. Wilson's adulterous love affair. This s not a book I would recommend to others.
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
wildh2o | 12 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jul 10, 2021 |
I found the biography rewarding primarily for the examination of the character of Acheson. Although the book was well-written, my greatest pleasure came from reading the details behind such a powerful and successful man, and I felt I shared many of the qualities of what was once greatness.
 
Merkitty asiattomaksi
James.Igoe | 2 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Jul 26, 2017 |
James Chace had an opportunity to tell a great story with his accounting of the Presidential election of 1912. Four very interesting men ran during a time when the US political landscape was changing and some very modern ideas were coming into play - things we take for granted today like an 8 hour workday, minimum wage, food and drug safety protections, regulation of businesses. After all, we had Taft and Teddy Roosevelt splitting the party, Wilson battling the Democratic party bosses, and the peak of the Socialist Party influence with Eugene Debs.

Unfortunately, Chace's retelling is only adequate. He's concise and moves the story along, but never seems to make the people come alive. I can't really recommend the book except to those studying the politics and political maneuvering of the era.
… (lisätietoja)
2 ääni
Merkitty asiattomaksi
drneutron | 12 muuta kirja-arvostelua | Oct 1, 2011 |

Listat

Palkinnot

You May Also Like

Associated Authors

Tilastot

Teokset
11
Also by
5
Jäseniä
620
Suosituimmuussija
#40,587
Arvio (tähdet)
½ 3.5
Kirja-arvosteluja
18
ISBN:t
19
Kielet
2
Kuinka monen suosikki
1

Taulukot ja kaaviot