|
Loading... Angels and Ages: A Short Book About Darwin, Lincoln, and Modern Life– tekijä: Adam Gopnik
LibraryThingin suosituksetJäsenten suosituksetLadataan...
et pitäisi
todennäköisesti et pitäisi
todennäköisesti pitäisit
pitäisit
pitäisit paljon Kirjaudu LibraryThingiin, niin näet, pidätkö tästä kirjasta vai et. Notable for a bibliographic essay at the end of the book. I really liked this book, it shows how two men from very different backgrounds showed the way to our age. Both Darwin and Lincoln, sharing the same birthday, were products of the enlightment. Certainly more for Darwin, but each of them using reason expanded the spirital values of the world. A wonderful read Celebrating Two Great Men Essayist Adam Gopnik attempts to tackle the connections between intellectuals Charles Darwin and Abraham Lincoln, both born on 1809 (coinciding with the bicentennial anniversary). The title "Angels and Ages" refers to the dispute over what Edwin Stanton was alleged to have said over Lincoln's deathbed "Now he belongs to the ages?" or "Now he belongs to the angels?" Gopnick dovetails this analogy to Darwin's from "ape or angels?" referring to the perpetual debate between Science and God. The book is read like an extended essay, just over 200 pages. I thought the sections about Darwin were better written and argued overall, whereas the Lincoln sections appeared to be incomplete. Although, I think one could argue that it was simply due to the vast differences between their respective bodies of work, Darwin was an intellectual, Lincoln led one of the most consequential wars in US history. Overall, I thought this was a very well-thought out, well-argued essay about two of the most influential people in mankind. The connections between the two are more abstract than real, but Gopnik does a good job weaving through the analogies. A good read for an afternoon or two for sure. näyttää 4/4 ei arvosteluja | lisää arvostelu
Amazon.com Product Description (ISBN 0307270785, Hardcover)On a memorable day in human history, February 12, 1809, two babies were born an ocean apart: Abraham Lincoln in a one-room Kentucky log cabin; Charles Darwin on an English country estate. It was a time of backward-seeming notions, when almost everyone still accepted the biblical account of creation as the literal truth and authoritarianism as the most natural and viable social order. But by the time both men died, the world had changed: ordinary people understood that life on earth was a story of continuous evolution, and the Civil War had proved that a democracy could fight for principles and endure. And with these signal insights much else had changed besides. Together, Darwin and Lincoln had become midwives to the spirit of a new world, a new kind of hope and faith. (haettu Amazonista Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:58:16 -0400) Ensimmäinen testikierros on päättynyt. Käy ryhmässä Open Shelves Classification tutustumassa asiaan. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gopnik gets big points for noticing one important way in which Lincoln and Darwin were alike, as men and as writers: they built grand ideas on solid foundations of carefully accumulated detail. People came to accept Darwin's theory because he presented such a mass of closely-observed evidence to back it up. Lincoln could remake American law and society so thoroughly because he could, like the lawyer he was, buttress his arguments with citations of precedent and history, arranged in a coldly logical manner no one could deny. Accept his premise, and you had to accept his conclusion -- that was true of both the Emancipator and the shy Mr. Darwin.
Gopnik spends a lot of time talking about the words spoken by Lincoln's War Secretary just after Abe died: did Stanton say "Now he belongs to the ages," or did he utter "Now he belongs to the angels?" Frankly, I don't care, and we'll never now. It seems like the kind of angels-on-the-head-of-a-pin question that neither Darwin nor Lincoln would have dawdled with for long.