Niall Leonard

La vida de Finn da bastante asco. Pero ahora, además, es una pesadilla: alguien ha matado a su padre y él es el principal sospechoso.
Sin nada que perder, tendrá que jugarse el cuello en una carrera contrarreloj para limpiar su nombre y averiguar quién lo hizo en realidad. Deberá rastrear hasta el último rincón de los bajos fondos londinenses, destapar oscuros secretos familiares y enfrentarse a policías corruptos, mafiosos de altos vuelos y femmes-fatales sin escrúpulos... sólo para descubrir que aquellos en los que más confías son los únicos que te pueden sorprender con la guardia baja.… (lisätietoja)

It’s January 1901, and Queen Victoria lies dying. Her German grandson, Kaiser Wilhelm II, has come to pay his last respects, a fact well known to anarchists, the more violent of whom would use the queen’s upcoming funeral to take one or more royal heads. Chief Superintendent William Melville of Scotland Yard’s Special Branch, already tasked with security at the funeral, now has even greater responsibility.

Further, the most likely assassin quickly demonstrates a ruthlessness and tactical skill not usually associated with long-haired bomb-throwers. And since the funeral will take place in a week, a national event of utmost importance, Melville has very little time to hunt his quarry. Every move he makes risks exposure in the press, which could cause a disaster with international complications.

This elegant premise drives an utterly satisfying thriller of high-stakes police work and cold-blooded politics. First among its several pleasures ranks the story, in which absolutely nothing goes as planned, and in which Melville, a thorough professional of excellent instincts, nevertheless makes costly mistakes. He’s human, in other words, but it’s more than that. As with all good thrillers, this one sets a brief timeframe and then shortens it, so that each red herring he chases costs him precious hours, as does every occasion in which the villain outwits him.

Consequently, the narrative reads as if Leonard invented reversals; even better, all the obstacles and adaptations to them feel plausible. In another twist, Melville’s chief ally on the ground is Gustav Steinhauer, a member of the kaiser’s retinue, capable in a tight spot, yet a liar about his role on the emperor’s staff, his past, and perhaps even his origins.

So it’s a classic setup, in which our hero doesn’t know whether the people whom circumstance forces him to trust are actually working against him. Likewise, Melville’s boss, an incompetent who owes his position to lineage and political connections, would love to send his subordinate packing. Both men are Irish, but Melville is lower-class and Catholic, therefore an embarrassment to his superior’s pretensions. He’s waiting for Melville to fail.

Another pleasure of M, King’s Bodyguard is its voice, for Melville’s a good example of a narrator who bows to convention outwardly, only to have subversive thoughts. At times, he seems a wee too progressive for a man of his time and position, perhaps more suited to our present age than Edwardian Britain. Even so, you have to like his sardonic commentary, as with his observations about anarchists, one of whom, a nonviolent believer, supplies him with information. “Mother of God, but these idealists make it so hard on themselves. They may sneer at those of us who have faith, but at least we Catholics can get absolution for our mistakes; they flog themselves daily with scourges of their own making.”

In similar fashion, Melville lets fly to himself about the visiting emperor, corrupt members of the ruling class, or, a hospital, an emblem of moral self-righteousness.

I also enjoy the political intrigue, which involves the diplomacy leading up to the alliances that later form the background for the First World War, my favorite historical era. That lends the novel a genuine air, as does the very real fear of anarchists, who've killed various heads of state in the preceding years. One criticism: I’m not sure the anarchist characters here would have taken time out to soapbox in otherwise violent scenes. Still, I appreciate Leonard’s attempt to integrate anarchism into the narrative, rather than simply deploy it as a convenient device. He’s done his homework, and overall, the narrative wears it well.

I wasn’t entirely startled to learn, from the author’s afterword, that William Melville is a historical figure. But it did surprise me that Steinhauer is too — and that his writings, thirty years after the fact, provide the story.

At the end, you get the idea that Melville, having realized the extent of the espionage threat to Britain, will take action, which will no doubt require further adventures. Count me in.… (lisätietoja)

For me, the sign of a successful historical fiction is this: does it make me want to learn more about the people, place, or time with which it’s taken creative liberties? Niall Leonard’s M, King’s Bodyguard accomplishes this and piqued my interest about a man and an event that would have otherwise remained in the shadows of history.

The novel follows William Melville, royal bodyguard and Detective Chief Superintendent of Britain’s Special Branch as he attempts to thwart an anarchist attack at Queen Victoria’s royal funeral procession. It runs the gamut from police procedural to espionage thriller, and even has its “buddy cop” moments with the arrival of Gustav Steinhauer, bodyguard to Kaiser Wilhelm, who assists Melville in his manhunt around Edwardian London.

There are no Sherlockian high theatrics of deduction in this, just a depiction of honest detective work, and Niall has given Melville a compelling narrative voice that shares the hits as well as the misses and their consequences, with the reader. Overall, this is a read that will leave you curious about what future cases await Melville and will have you happily googling to learn more about our protagonist and this cast of characters.… (lisätietoja)